1. [A] formal legal document whereby a right is created or confirmed, or a fact recorded; a formal writing of any kind as an agreement, deed, charter, or record drawn up and executed in technical form. Re Cape Breton/Skull Island [2010] Ab Ovo Non-Serviam at 666 H.C.
2. In the law of evidence, the term has a still wider meaning, including also witnesses and things animate and inanimate that may be presented for inspection by the tribunal.
It's said we should learn from our history. In the case of the coal miners of Cape Breton, not only have they learned, they haven't forgotten. The history of their union is one filled with unrest, battles and death. The stories are passed from generation to generation so that the union's history is as vivid for today's miners as for their forefathers who lived it.
Coal mining in Nova Scotia has never been easy. Miners fought every step for fair wages, working conditions and benefits. Along the way some of the most bitter fights were with each other as two unions battled for supremacy.
People were afraid to disobey the companies, for good reason. Basically, they belonged to the companies, lived in company houses, and bought supplies in company stores....
In 1920, the Dominion Coal Company was sold to a new company, the British Empire Steel Corporation or Besco. Within the year it cut wages by two thirds. The union won an injunction against the cut, but Besco successfully appealed. The miners had no choice but to work for just a fraction of their former pay.
The Gillen Commission was set up in 1922 to resolve the wage problem. That year the Dominion Bureau of Statistics estimated it cost a miner 90 per cent of his earnings to pay rent and feed his family. Contract workers actually paid more for rent and food than they received in weekly wages.
The commission didn't resolve anything and Besco cut wages by 30 per cent. The local union called a slowdown strike. The Company Stores cut credit to the employees during the strike. The international union refused to support the slowdown, but the men paid no attention and cut production by one third.
Unlike the strike of 1909, this one was relatively peaceful. Miners were allowed to stay in their houses, but again the militia was called in. About 1,200 of His Majesty's Cavalry arrived in Cape Breton and set up machine gun nests around the collieries. The strike lasted eight months and in the end the men returned to work with an 18 per cent cut in pay from the 1921 rates and contract men received an increase of 52 cents a day.
Local UMW president Dan Livingstone wrote: "The wage schedule was accepted under muzzles of rifles, machine guns and the gleaming bayonets with further threatened invasion of troops and warships standing to. The miners, facing hunger, their Dominion and Provincial governments lined up with Besco, the men were forced to accept the proposals."
At the very start, Besco vice-president J.E. McLurg said, "We hold all the cards ... they (the miners) will have to come to us ... they can't stand the gaff." The statement infuriated the strikers who became even more determined to prove McLurg wrong.
The company again refused to give the men credit at its stores. This time sympathy was with the miners and their families. Independent merchants continued to give credit, fishermen contributed their catch, the British Canadian Cooperative donated $500 and in Boston, expatriate Maritimers formed a Cape Breton Relief Committee.
Even with the extra support, the strikers were suffering. The town of New Waterford was particularly hard hit. The town's water supply and electricity came from New Waterford Lake, a few miles from the town. It was controlled by Besco police who terrorized people by charging through the town on horseback, ignorant of anything or anyone in their path.
On June 11th, about 3,000 men and boys gathered in the town and marched toward the power plant. They were met by 100 armed police and the so-called Battle of Waterford Lake began. The crowd attacked the police, hauling them off their horses and beating them. The men said they were driven to battle because the water and power to their homes and school had been cut off. Some officers actually jumped into the lake and swam to the other side for safety. Others stood their ground and fired into the crowd.
Three miners were shot. Gilbert Watson was hit in the stomach. Michael O'Handley was wounded and trampled by horses. William Davis was fatally shot in the heart. The tragedy is remembered each year on June 11th when workers around the province mark Bill Davis Day.
The battle prompted the new Conservative premier, E. N. Rhodes, to get involved. He met with Besco officials on July 16th. The police force was withdrawn and the wage set at the 1922 level, a reduction of six to eight per cent. In August the miners voted to accept the Rhodes' proposal.
The strike lasted for 155 days. J.B. McLachlan was quoted as saying, "Under capitalism, the working class has but two courses to follow: crawl - or fight." The coal miners of Cape Breton remember and continue to fight.
Aldous Huxley: The charm of history and its enigmatic lesson consist in the fact that, from age to age, nothing changes and yet everything is completely different.
E. L. Doctorow: History is the present. That's why every generation writes it anew. But what most people think of as history is its end product, myth.
Edward Gibbon: I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know no way of judging of the future but by the past.
Etienne Gilson: History is the only laboratory we have in which to test the consequences of thought.
George Bernard Shaw: We learn from history that we learn nothing from history.
Gustave Flaubert: Our ignorance of history causes us to slander our own times.
H. G. Wells: History is a race between education and catastrophe.
Henry Ford: History is more or less bunk. It's tradition. We don't want tradition. We want to live in the present and the only history that is worth a tinker's damn is the history we make today.
Henry Steele Commager: History, we can confidently assert, is useful in the sense that art and music, poetry and flowers, religion and philosophy are useful. Without it -- as with these -- life would be poorer and meaner; without it we should be denied some of those intellectual and moral experiences which give meaning and richness to life. Surely it is no accident that the study of history has been the solace of many of the noblest minds of every generation.
These words circulate throughout occult and magical circles, and they come from Hermetic texts. The concept was first laid out in The Emerald Tablet of Hermes Trismegistus, in the words "That which is Below corresponds to that which is Above, and that which is Above, corresponds to that which is Below, to accomplish the miracles of the One Thing"[18].
In accordance with the various levels of reality: physical, mental, and spiritual, this relates that what happens on any level happens on every other. This is however more often used in the sense of the microcosm and the macrocosm. The microcosm is oneself, and the macrocosm is the universe. The macrocosm is as the microcosm, and vice versa; within each lies the other, and through understanding one (usually the microcosm) you can understand the other[40].
“Really, the fundamental, ultimate mystery -- the only thing you need to know to understand the deepest metaphysical secrets -- is this: that for every outside there is an inside and for every inside there is an outside, and although they are different, they go together.”-- Alan Watts quote
Gospel of Thomas (No. 3a): If those who entice you say to you, ‘See, the kingdom is in heaven!’―then the birds of heaven will be there before you. If they say to you, ‘It is in the sea!’―then the fishes will be there before you. But the kingdom is within you―and without as well.
(No. 113): His disciples said to him: ‘When will the kingdom come?’ ‘It will not come when it is expected. They will not say “See, here it is!” or “See, there it is!”―but the kingdom of the Father is spread abroad on the earth and men do not see it’.12
“The wise men understood that this natural world is only an image and a copy of paradise. The existence of this world is simply a guarantee that there exists a world that is perfect. God created the world so that, through its visible objects, men could understand his spiritual teachings and the marvels of his wisdom.” ---The Alchemist, Paulo Coelho
"I've always liked reptiles. I used to see the universe as a mammoth snake, and I used to see all the people and objects, landscapes, as little pictures in the facets of their scales. I think peristaltic motion is the basic life movement. Swallowing,"
Jim Morrison quotes (American Poet and Singer. Member of the American band The Doors and one of rock music's mythic figures. 1943-1971) “I’m an adventurer, looking for treasure.”
The Alchemist picked up a book that someone in the caravan had brought. Leafing through the pages, he found a story about Narcissus. The alchemist knew the legend of Narcissus, a youth who knelt daily beside a lake to contemplate his own beauty. He was so fascinated by himself that, one morning, he fell into the lake and drowned. At the spot where he fell, a flower was born, which was called the narcissus. But this was not how the author of the book ended the story. He said that when Narcissus died, the goddesses of the forest appeared and found the lake, which had been fresh water, transformed into a lake of salty tears. “Why do you weep?” the goddesses asked. “I weep for Narcissus,” the lake replied. “Ah, it is no surprise that you weep for Narcissus,” they said, “for though we always pursued him in the forest, you alone could contemplate his beauty close at hand.” “But...was Narcissus beautiful?” the lake asked. “Who better than you to know that?” the goddesses said in wonder. “After all, it was by your banks that he knelt each day to contemplate himself!” The lake was silent for some time. Finally, it said: “I weep for Narcissus, but I never noticed that Narcissus was beautiful. I weep because, each time he knelt beside my banks, I could see, in the depths of his eyes, my own beauty reflected.”
A Canadian study shows the synthetic cannabinoid HU210 and the endocannabinoid anandamide promote neuron growth ....THC has been found to reduce tumor growth in common lung cancer by 50 percent and to significantly reduce the ability of the cancer to spread, say researchers at Harvard University...According to a 2007 study by scientists at the ... California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, a compound found in cannabis, cannabidiol (CBD), may stop breast cancer from spreading throughout the body...found the active chemical in marijuana promotes the death of brain cancer cells by essentially helping them feed upon themselves in a process called autophagy...and it's very nutritious and you can make over 50,000 products out of it....the list goes on and on.
Genesis 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.
Going Wodwo Shedding my shirt, my book, my coat, my life Leaving them, empty husks and fallen leaves Going in search of food and for a spring Of sweet water.
I'll find a tree as wide as ten fat men Clear water rolling over it's gray roots Berries I'll find, and crabapples and nuts, And call it home.
I'll tell the wind my name, an no one else. True madness takes or leaves us in the wood halfway through all our lives. My skin will be my face now.
I must be nuts. Sense left with shoes and house, my guts are cramped. I'll stumble through the green back to my roots, and leaves and thorns and buds, and shiver.
I'll leave the way of words to walk the wood I'll be the forest's man, and greet the sun, And feel the silence blossom on my tongue like language. --Neil Gaiman, from Fragile Things
Notice: Of Denial of Consent to be governed, Understanding and Intent and Claim to Right and request for information.
From: Thomas Kerk Jones, Agent
3516 Duggan Avenue New Waterford, N.S., B1H 1P8 thomaskerkjonesagent@gmail.com
To: Frank Corbett NDP, Cape Breton Centre 3397 Plummer Avenue, New Waterford, NS Postal Code: B1H 1Z1 Tele :(902)-862-9550 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting (902)-862-9550 end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting (902)-862-9550 end_of_the_skype_highlighting Fax: 902-862-9501 Email: frankmla@ns.sympatico.ca
Date : June 12th, 2009
Greetings Mr. Corbett, Congratulations on your recent election. I'm sure both you and your family are quite pleased and proud of your accomplishments. The reason I am writing to you today is to inform and notice you of my denial of consent to be governed; as well as to give you Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim to Right, and my status as a Child of God, the Son of the transcendent Godhead, the one true absolute God. I have decided now to exist without representation, and thus government. Although I do not desire conflict, my revulsion of subjugation and rejection of deception is far stronger than my desire to avoid conflict. I will not be subjugated. This courtesy letter is preceding a Claim of Right. Also I have included 20 questions, I would really appreciate your answers to. If you could include your oath of office and a statement declaring that you are bound by that oath, I would feel only then, that you or any public official is by forthright with me. No public official or "authority" has ever denied, corrected or included their oath or state they are bound by sed oath.
I, Thomas-Kirk: Jones; also known as Thomas-Kerk: Jones, a flesh and blood man and blessed living Soul serving God alone. I am not a corporation nor a government created fiction. I am a free-born sovereign individual to this land. I was born and given the name Thomas Kirk Jones, although now I spell my middle name differently to distinguish myself from the ALLCAPS entity THOMAS KIRK JONES. I have wrote via registered letter to the corporation known as the GOVERNMENT OF CANADA/CANADA and have their responses, addressed to myself, Kerk, to evidence the fact that I am not and could not be THOMAS KIRK JONES.
Recently, a peace officer knocked on my front door. He was handing out a "safer communities" survey. The irony of this my be not be immediately apparent. I gave the officer, free of charge, a 20 minute lecture on Acts/Statute Law. Acts are collections of statutes. Statues apply to corporations. Under the Interpretation Act of Canada, which defines what words legally mean here in Canada. Under the Interpretation Act of Canada the word "person" means a corporation. A corporation is a fictional entity, it exists only on paper and in the minds of living men and women. No living human being can be a corporation.
Interpretation Act I-21 An Act respecting the interpretation of statutes and regulations
SHORT TITLE
Short title 1. This Act may be cited as the Interpretation Act.
"person" personne + "person" , or any word or expression descriptive of a person, includes a corporation;
(27) "Person" means an individual, corporation, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, limited liability company, association, joint venture, government, governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality, public corporation, or any other legal or commercial entity. ---Fr UCC
Person - The Revised Code of Washington, RCW 1.16.080, (I live in Washington State) defines a person as follows: "The term 'person' may be construed to include the United States, this state, or any state or territory, or any public or private corporation, as well as an individual."
Person - Black's Law Dictionary 6th Edition, pg. 791, defines 'person' as follows: "In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person), though by statute term may include labor organizations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers."
Person - Oran's Dictionary of the Law, West Group 1999, defines Person as: 1. A human being (a "natural" person). 2. A corporation (an "artificial" person). Corporations are treated as persons in many legal situations. Also, the word "person" includes corporations in most definitions in this dictionary. 3. Any other "being" entitled to sue as a legal entity (a government, an association, a group of Trustees, etc.). 4. The plural of person is persons, not people (see that word). -
Person - Duhaime's Law Dictionary. An entity with legal rights and existence including the ability to sue and be sued, to sign contracts, to receive gifts, to appear in court either by themselves or by lawyer and, generally, other powers incidental to the full expression of the entity in law. Individuals are "persons" in law unless they are minors or under some kind of other incapacity such as a court finding of mental incapacity. Many laws give certain powers to "persons" which, in almost all instances, includes business organizations that have been formally registered such as partnerships, corporations or associations. -
Person, noun. per'sn. - Webster's 1828 Dictionary. Defines person as: [Latin persona; said to be compounded of per, through or by, and sonus, sound; a Latin word signifying primarily a mask used by actors on the stage.]
legal person - Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law 1996, defines a legal person as : a body of persons or an entity (as a corporation) considered as having many of the rights and responsibilities of a natural person and esp. the capacity to sue and be sued.
In Canada's Interpretation Act, section 35 (1) (US codes have an equivalent) person, or any word or expression descriptive of a person, includes a corporation; includes means: confines within. Legal Maxim Blacks Law Dictionary Revised 4th Edition 1968 Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius - The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. I finally got around to looking up the word Canada. Canada, for greater certainty, includes the internal waters of Canada and the territorial sea of Canada. So, Canada is not land; it is water! It is also a corporation registered with the SEC in Washington, DC.
(4) "Bank" means a person engaged in the business of banking and includes a savings bank, savings and loan association, credit union, and trust company. -UCC
(25) "Organization" means a person other than an individual.
(24) "Money" means a medium of exchange currently authorized or adopted by a domestic or foreign government. The term includes a monetary unit of account established by an intergovernmental organization or by agreement between two or more countries.
Toronto lawyer David Sherman, an authority on tax law, has little patience for detaxer theories. "Detaxers say that because of such and such an analysis going back to the Magna Carta or something, the government can't impose taxes and therefore the income tax is voluntary. That's like telling someone that you can cure AIDS by boiling toads under a full moon and inhaling the steam while you stand on one foot reciting Hamlet's soliloquy backwards. The idea is any medical professional would recognize that as nonsense, though someone desperate enough might try it if [he doesn't] know what's going on. These detaxers think they can know law without having any legal training. They read something that looks like it is written in English, but it's not, it's actually law and they think they understand it." http://www.camagazine.com/index.cfm/ci_id/6778/la_id/1/camagazine/1/print/true.htm
If you can't understand the words how can they be applied to you as if they have the force of law? Additionally, there are only two official languages English and French. This language called 'law' is not an official language is it? Of course lawyers make their money by ensuring the statutes are so convoluted and ambiguous that you need them to understand what is expressed within. This is exactly what Jesus railed against 2000 years ago; the Pharisees and Sadducee and Scribes who claimed exclusive right to understand the Law and then demanded rich payment to have the words deciphered.
If they aren't your words, they can't be your law and if you can't understand these words, they are not yours and thus should not be applied against you.
So, despite good intentions (Is the road to hell not paved with good intentions?) our peace officers are charging living human beings as corporations. Sadly, neither the peace officers, nor the "criminals" (or is victim more accurate?) are aware of this. The peace officer/policy enforcer at my front door did not, could not rebut me. I gave him some notes so he could research this important information himself. I am requesting, and I do believe it is necessary, that you inform the local police/peace officers/policy enforcers, that I am a Freeman and not subject to statue laws since they apply to "person(s)" and that I have noticed you with Claim of Right. I will also go down to the local police station and see if I can speak to whom ever has the most authority and explain my Claim of Right. Under section 39 of the CCC;
39. (1) Every one who is in peaceable possession of personal property under a claim of right, and every one acting under his authority, is protected from criminal responsibility for defending that possession, even against a person entitled by law to possession of it, if he uses no more force than is necessary.
The following are some of the more important concepts for true Peace Officers to understand and grasp. If they cannot or will not comprehend then they simply cannot properly fulfill their duties.
1. Canada is a Common Law jurisdiction. 2. The only form of government recognized as lawful is a representative one. 3. Representation requires mutual consent. 4. Consent must be freely given and not a result of coercion or duress. 5. A statute is defined as a legislated rule of society given the force of law. 6. A society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal. 7. The Corporation of the City of Vancouver is in fact a corporation; a fictional legal entity. It is not a geographical area but it is a person. 8. A human being cannot exist within a fiction. (The truth dispels fiction) 9. The Rule of Law states conflict is avoidable, unnecessary and undesirable and when it raises its head we are to deal with it using discussion, negotiation and then if necessary adjudication in a court of competent jurisdiction. 10. The court of competent jurisdiction is a result of two parties attempting and failing to resolve a potential dispute using discussion and negotiation in Good Faith. 11. If a party refuses to discuss or negotiate, they abandon the right to seek adjudication in the issue at hand, as they abandoned the rule of law and it is impossible for a court of competent jurisdiction to be raised. 12. According to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, courts in this land have no authority to adjudicate unless both parties consent to the adjudication. 13. I have no obligation to consent to adjudication if the opposing party has abandoned the rule of law by refusing to avoid conflict by engaging in discussion. 14. According to a unanimous ruling from the SCC, since Canada is a common law jurisdiction and the only form of government recognized as lawful is a representational model, the power to govern is a direct result of the consent of the governed. They did not say consent of the majority of the governed either. Individuals must consent individually, as no one may consent to representation on behalf of another. (I cannot hire someone to represent you without your consent and knowledge, nor can you hire a representative for me. Just because others consent to be represented does not mean I am obliged to as well.) 15. The right to elect our government necessarily implies the right to elect to have a government. If the only option we have is to choose who are masters will be, then we are nothing better than slaves who can choose their masters. Free men do not have masters. I am a free man and I do not have a master. 16. The statute against sedition necessarily implies that we have an option to escape government control which is peaceful. If we did not have an out, violence would be lawfully and morally justified to escape tyranny. The fact that we may not employ said violence indicates the existence of an out which does not require violence. 17. This out is our right to deny consent to be governed. 18. Neither corrections officers nor Sheriffs and their Deputies can lawfully claim authority over those who deny consent to be governed.
There are of course many more, however these key ones must be immediately taught in order for the Law and Justice to be served.
Now before I go any further here are the 20 questions I would like you to answer. If you cannot answer them within 10 business days if receiving this notice, I shall answer them for you and it shall stand as your consent and agreement that my answers are true. This seems fair to me.
1. What exactly is the number on the back (front) of my Birth Certificate? 2. Why is it not identified as to its function? 3. Is it a 'bond tracking' number? 4. If so, when was a bond generated? a) Who generated it? b) Did they enjoy informed consent? 5. What is the value of the bond, assuming there is one? 6. Who owns title to that bond? 7. Does that bond generate revenue? 8. Does my pledge, promise, oath or obligation, support the bond, if there is one? 9. If yes, when did I pledge, promise or make oath? 10. If there is no money in my bond generating revenue, who stole my money? 11. Who initially put money in the bond? 12. Is interest paid on that bond? 13. If so, to whom and how much interest is paid? 14. Does the revenue generated by the bond, if there is any, form part of the 'Federal Transfer Payments' the Federal and Provincial levels of government bicker over? 15. Would either level of representation have the right to control or access those payments if they were not acting as a representative? 16. To who do those Federal Transfer Payments actually belong? 17. Is there a fiduciary over the bond? 18. If so who is it? a) If not does this mean NO ONE is in charge of the bond? 19. Is it true we have the right to deny consent to be represented and thus governed? 20. Has your hand been 'in the cookie jar'?
Please answer these questions as herein directed. Many people want and need to know the answers to these simple questions. If you cannot or will not answer them, all must conclude that you are grossly incapable of representing me, and appropriate and lawful steps will then be taken.
There is a Greek law maxim (maxims are still valid today) that it is a fraud to conceal a fraud. I have been pursuing this line of research for over two years. Many members of the "government" (The corporation, CANADA) are unaware. There are however, many who are helping to perpetrate this. I have lost all my faith in public officials and peace officers. It has been both a rewarding and uplifting journey of freedom and a sad display of amount of corruption and ignorance that is present today. I cannot believe how hard it is to get what is mine under contract law/common law and help benefit my family and community. I reserve all my common law rights and reserve the right to edit any one of my Claim of Right as I see fit, at any time.
I thank you for your time and await your answers to my 20 questions. If you happen to bump into your next door neighbor at your office, I do believe he is a Notary, please tell him I'll be paying him a visit soon to discuss my Notice of Understanding and Intent Claim of Right and my Child of God status.
Non-Serviam "I will not serve." I will not serve that in which I no longer believe, whether it call itself my home, my fatherland or my church and I will try to express myself in some mode of life or art as freely as I can and as wholly as I can, using for my defense the only arms I allow myself to use--silence, exile and cunning. (Paradise Lost, John Milton, 1674; Portrait of an artist as a young man, James Joyce, 1914).
Sincerely and without malice aforethought, ill-will, vexation or frivolity, All Rights Reserved, With prejudice, UCC 1-207, UCC 1-308, Non-asumpsit ____________________________________________________ Thomas-Kerk: Jones, Agent Witness:____________________________________________ Witness:____________________________________________ Witness:____________________________________________
Constructive Notice of Denial of Consent
Whereas The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that the power of governments to govern comes from the consent of the governed, and, Whereas consent must be freely given and can never be forced, but can be gained expressly or tacitly, and, Whereas it my understanding that the government of the Province of Nova Scotia uses deception to gain the consent to govern, and, Whereas most people do not know we can deny our consent to be governed, and, Whereas I cannot, in good conscience, support any organization which uses unlawful means to generate agreements and manufacture apparent consent, and, Whereas the wording in many statutes is misleading to the point of deception.
Be it known, that I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones, as of [Day/Month/Year do hereby deny consent to be governed by any and all parties. No statutes can be deemed to apply to me for they are the product of a governing body; one that I do not consent to. I will not pay any taxes for the collection of taxes is a function of government and with my denial of consent. I free myself of any association with all governing bodies. I acknowledge I give up certain benefits. I affirm that all my Common Law Rights are still intact and I state my intent to exercise those rights. These rights include, but are not limited to, the right to private property and the right to travel on a public roadway without a license. Dated: ___________________ Claimant: Thomas-Kerk: Jones Signature: _____________________ Witness Signature (1): __________________________ Witness Signature (2): __________________________ Witness Signature (3): __________________________
Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right
Whereas it is my understanding Canada is a common law jurisdiction, and, Whereas it is my understanding equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and, Whereas it is my understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law, and, Whereas it is my understanding a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and, Whereas it is my understanding the only form of government recognized as lawful in Canada is a representative one, and, Whereas it is my understanding representation requires mutual consent, and, Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist, and, Whereas it is my understanding all Acts are statutes restricted in scope and applicability by the Constitution Act, and, Whereas it is my understanding Section 32 of the Constitution Act limits it to members and employees of government, and, Whereas it is my understanding those who have a SIN (Social Insurance Number) are in fact employees of the federal government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the federal government, and, Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to abandon one's SIN, and, Whereas it is my understanding people in Canada have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and, Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and, Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and, Whereas I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones am a Freeman-on-the-Land, and, Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully within community standards does not breach the peace, and, Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and, Whereas as I am a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility and not a child, I do not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability, and, Whereas it is my understanding a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and, Whereas it is my understanding corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and, Whereas it is my understanding legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones actions, and, Whereas it is my understanding that I have a right to use my property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and, Whereas I claim the right to collect a pension if I have paid into it and claim that said right is not affected if I abandon my Social Insurance Number, and, Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation to attend and create no obligation or dishonor if ignored, and,
Whereas it is my understanding peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law, and, Whereas I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have not observed me breach the peace, and, Whereas permanent estoppel by acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land under any Act is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time, Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones a Freeman-on-the-Land do hereby state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations restrictions and maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter .
Furthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my communitiesÆ standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for truth and maximum freedom. Furthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held by me is held under a claim of right as mentioned in the Criminal Code of Canada. Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or color of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure. Furthermore, I claim that the courts in Nova Scotia are de-facto and are in fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further claim they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services. Furthermore, I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as herein stated as a Freeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any Act. Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated and TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent. Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way. Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms. Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both. Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit. Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within TEN (10) days of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered with a Notary no later than ten days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service.
Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land Thomas-Kerk: Jones.
Place of claim of right: The town of New Waterford, Cape Breton, Nova Scotia Claimant: Thomas-Kerk: Jones Signature: _____________________
Immediate, Constructive and Effective Notice of Claim of `Child of God' Status
Whereas Canada is a nation founded upon the belief in the principles of the supremacy of God and the rule of law, and, Whereas the above sentence defines a hierarchy, with God at the top, and, Whereas the number two position in that hierarchy is not claimed by anyone, and, Whereas the governments of this nation seem to rely on deception to gain the power to govern, and, Whereas I am desirous of living my life as a 'Child of God, and, Whereas the only powers able to claim any authority over a 'Child of God' is God, and, Whereas neither the government, nor it's agents nor it's representatives or employees are God, or above God, and, Whereas by legally claiming the number two position in the above mentioned hierarchy, I occupy a position above all governments and their agents and employees and representatives,
Be it known to any and all, that on this date, Thomas-Kerk: Jones, I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones, a free human being, do hereby lawfully claim the status of a 'Child of God'. Any human being who wishes to claim any authority over me must first prove they exist above God; they are God; they are between me and God; or they have a document upon the face of which can be found the verifiable signature of God. Failure to first do one of the above mentioned things means all claims to authority is abandoned or is unlawful. Attempting to exercise any authority over me without first fulfilling one of the four above mentioned requirements is an unlawful act of fraud and/or extortion. Signed: ______________________________ Date: ____________________ Witness: ______________________________Date: ____________________ Witness: ______________________________Date: ____________________
Constructive Notice and Claim of Right to Possess, Grow, Trade, Sell, and Consume Marijuana
Whereas I am a Human Being with certain inalienable rights, and, Whereas I understand that the right to posses marijuana is finally being recognized by the governments of this Nation, and, Whereas I understand that it appears that the government's in question have not properly instructed their agents as to my right without limit, possess, grow and use marijuana, and, Whereas I desire to exercise my rights fully and completely in a lawful adn peaceful manner, without confrontational interaction with Peace Officers or other government agents, and, Whereas I desire to establish a legal foundation to exercise my right to possess, grow, use, carry and otherwise enjoy marijuana, and, Whereas I understand that by serving it upon The Attorney General I am serving it upon all Peace Officers under his authority, and, Whereas I understand that by serving it upon any Peace Officer I am also serving it upon the Attorney General, and, Whereas I understand ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law, and, Whereas the word "confiscate" legally means "to remove without legal right", and, Whereas I understand that Peace Officers who "confiscate" my marijuana are trained to use deadly force and are in fact stealing and acting under the color of law, and, Whereas I understand such actions are unlawful and against both the Common Law and Commercial Law, and, Whereas I understand that those Officers who steal my property can be sued for gross negligence, theft, and other indictable offenses, and, Whereas I have no desire to enter into any legal conflict with good Peace Officers and do desire to enter into any legal conflict with good Peace Officers and do desire peace BE IT KNOWN TO ANY AND ALL THAT I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones A FREE HUMAN BEING, ON THIS DAY __________ DO HEREBY ESTABLISH BY LAWFUL CLAIM OF RIGHT THE LEGAL RIGHT TO POSSESS, GROW, USE, HOLD, CARRY AND OTHERWISE ENJOY MARIJUANA AND ALL ITS DERIVATIVES WITHOUT LIMIT. All concerned parties have ten (10) business days to respond to this Notice in like manner or with a Notary. Failure to do so within ten (10) business days means you forever forfeit the right to claim conflict in this issue with me. Signed:_________________________________ Thomas-Kerk: Jones Witness:________________________________ Witness:________________________________ Witness:________________________________
Constructive Notice and Claim of Right to Possess, Grow, Trade, Sell, and Consume Entheogens and Psyilocibin "Magic" Mushrooms
Whereas I am a Human Being with certain inalienable rights, and, Whereas I understand that the right to posses entheogens and psyilocibin "magic" mushrooms is finally being recognized by the governments of this Nation, and, Whereas I understand that it appears that the government's in question have not properly instructed their agents as to my right without limit, possess, grow and use enthogens and psyilocibin "magic" mushrooms, and, Whereas I desire to exercise my rights fully and completely in a lawful adn peaceful manner, without confrontational interaction with Peace Officers or other government agents, and, Whereas I desire to establish a legal foundation to exercise my right to possess, grow, use, carry and otherwise enjoy entheogens and psyilocibin "magic" mushrooms, and, Whereas I understand that by serving it upon The Attorney General I am serving it upon all Peace Officers under his authority, and, Whereas I understand that by serving it upon any Peace Officer I am also serving it upon the Attorney General, and, Whereas I understand ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law, and, Whereas the word "confiscate" legally means "to remove without legal right", and, Whereas I understand that Peace Officers who "confiscate" my entheogens and psyilocibin "magic" mushrooms are trained to use deadly force and are in fact stealing and acting under the color of law, and, Whereas I understand such actions are unlawful and against both the Common Law and Commercial Law, and, Whereas I understand that those Officers who steal my property can be sued for gross negligence, theft, and other indictable offenses, and, Whereas I have no desire to enter into any legal conflict with good Peace Officers and do desire to enter into any legal conflict with good Peace Officers and do desire peace BE IT KNOWN TO ANY AND ALL THAT I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones A FREE HUMAN BEING, ON THIS DAY __________ DO HEREBY ESTABLISH BY LAWFUL CLAIM OF RIGHT THE LEGAL RIGHT TO POSSESS, GROW, USE, HOLD, CARRY AND OTHERWISE ENJOY ENTHEOGENS AND PSYILOCIBIN "MAGIC" MUSHROOMS AND ALL THEIR DERIVATIVES WITHOUT LIMIT. All concerned parties have ten (10) business days to respond to this Notice in like manner or with a Notary. Failure to do so within ten (10) business days means you forever forfeit the right to claim conflict in this issue with me. Signed:_________________________________ Thomas-Kerk: Jones
Notice
From: Thomas-Kerk: Jones, Freeman-On-The-Land Mail pick-up @ 3516 Duggan Avenue New Waterford, N.S., B1H 1P8 thomaskerkjonesagent@gmail.com
To: Frank Corbett NDP, Cape Breton Centre 3397 Plummer Avenue, New Waterford, NS Postal Code: B1H 1Z1 Tele :(902)-862-9550 Fax: 902-862-9501 Email: frankmla@ns.sympatico.ca DATE: _________________________ Hi! I am Thomas-Kerk: Jones and I recently wrote to you, asking twenty simple questions as well as filing a Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right, Denial of Consent to be Governed, Child of God Status, Claim of Right to Marijuana and Claim of Right to Enthogens.
I informed you that if you failed to respond and answer those questions, I would answer them for you, and you would be bound by those answers as if they had been your own. As you have had time to respond, and have not, and as I am sure you have seen these questions before, your reluctance to answer is strongly indicative of fraudulent activity. Here are the answers to the questions. Now, if you are ever asked them again, you can refer to this correspondence and your other constituents won’t have to wait or otherwise feel they are being defrauded.
What exactly is the number on the back (front) of my Birth Certificate? Answer: Bond Tracking Number Why is it not identified as to its function? Answer: Government does not want us to realize the Bonds’ existence. Is it a 'bond tracking' number? Answer: YES! If so, when was a bond generated Answer: When our parents registered our birth. Who generated it? Answer: The government did, with the apparent consent of our parents. Did they enjoy informed consent? Answer: NO, they did not! What is the value of the bond, assuming there is one? Answer: At least One Million Dollars Who owns title to that bond? Answer: Whoever holds The Record of Live Birth (Government) Does that bond generate revenue? Answer: If it does not, someone is guilty of either theft, or gross negligence. Does my pledge, promise, oath or obligation, support the bond, if there is one? Answer: YES! If yes, when did I pledge, promise or make oath? Answer: Your parents initially made oath, you confirmed when you applied for your SIN. If there is no money in my bond generating revenue, who stole my money? Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation. Who initially put money in the bond? Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation. Is interest paid on that bond? Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation. If so, to whom and how much interest is paid? Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation. Does the revenue generated by the bond, if there is any, form part of the 'Federal Transfer Payments' the Federal and Provincial levels of government bicker over? Answer: YES! Would either level of representation have the right to control or access those payments if they were not acting as a representative? Answer: NO! To who do those Federal Transfer Payments actually belong? Answer: Whoever is being represented. Is there a fiduciary over the bond? Answer: YES, of course! If so who is it? Answer: The Minister of Finance If not does this mean NO ONE is in charge of the bond? Is it true we have the right to deny consent to be represented and thus governed? Answer: Absolutely! Has your hand been 'in the cookie jar'? Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation.
As all can tell from our agreed upon answers to these questions, there is clearly a need for an RCMP investigation on five or more separate issues. If you do not agree this is the case, please get back to me within 7 days. I will be including a copy of this letter to the Commissioner of the RCMP and informing them that both I and my Member of Parliament feel there is a need for an immediate investigation.
I have served you and your corporation and it's parent with notice informing you my denial of consent to be governed and to live free of all statutory regulation. I intend to express and make use of my God-given rights. I am not a corporation, a fiction, property of the Federal Reserve or any of its subsidiaries or any other commercial entity. I have no Queen and am not the property of the Royal Family, the Bank of London or the Vatican. I claim ownership and Claim of Right against all my property, including but not excluded to my Birth Registration Bond/Trust as evidenced by the number on the back of birth certificate and the original Statement of Live Birth, all of those funds are for my benefit and to be used as I see fit. I am Noticing that the property at the locations 3516 and 3522 Duggan Avenue, in New Waterford, are private property, our family's and held under Claim of Right. Please keep your agents from trespassing, they are not allowed onto the property unless I invite them, with the exception of the mail carrier.
I am abandoning my S.I.N. I am not a number I am a Freeman.
I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated and TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent. Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way. Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms. Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both. Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit. Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within TEN (10) days of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered with a Notary no later than ten days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service.
Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land Thomas-Kerk: Jones. ______________________________________ Thomas-Kerk: Jones, Freeman-on-the-Land All Rights Reserved, exercised at will and fully defended by the Grace of God. All my property including my body held under a Claim of Right as per Section 39 of the Criminal Code of Canada. Lawful Excuse established as per Sections 126 and 127 of the Criminal Code of Canada. Witness:________________________________ _________________ Witness:________________________________ _________________ Witness:________________________________ _________________
Notice: Of Denial of Consent to be governed, Understanding and Intent and Claim to Right and request for information.
From: Thomas Kerk Jones, Agent
Mail picked up @ 3516 Duggan Avenue New Waterford, N.S., B1H 1P8 thomaskerkjonesagent@gmail.com
To: All Peace Officers/Policy Enforcers In New Waterford
Civic Service Center New Waterford 3365 Plummer Ave. Phone : (902) 862-3512
The reason I am writing to you today is to inform and notice you of my denial of consent to be goverened; as well as to give you Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim to Right, and my status as a Child of God, the Son of the trancedent Godhead, the one true absolute God. I have decided to exist without representation, and thus government. Although I do not desire conflict, my revulsion of subjugation and rejection of deception is far stronger than my desire to avoid conflict. I will not be subjugated. This courtesy letter is preceding a Claim of Right. Also I have included 20 questions, I would really appreciate your answers to. If you could include your oath of office and a statement declaring that you are bound by that oath, I would feel only then, that you or any public official is by forthright with me. No public offical or "authority" has ever denied, corrected or included their oath or state they are bound by sed oath.
I, Thomas-Kirk: Jones; also known as Thomas-Kerk: Jones, a flesh and blood man and blessed living Soul serving God alone. I am not a corporation nor a government created fiction. I am a free-born sovereign individual to this land. I was born and given the name Thomas Kirk Jones, although now I spell my middle name differently to distinguish myself from the ALLCAPS entity THOMAS KIRK JONES. I have wrote via registered letter to the corporation known as the GOVERNMENT OF CANADA/CANADA and have their responses, addressed to myself, Kerk, to evidence the fact that I am not and could not be THOMAS KIRK JONES.
Recently, a peace officer knocked on my front door. He was handing out a "safer communities" survey. The irony of this my be not be immediatly appearent. I gave the officer, free of charge, a 20 minute lecture on Acts/Statute Law. Acts are collections of statutes. Statues apply to corporations. Under the Interpretation Act of Canada, which defines what words legally mean here in Canada. Under the Interpretation Act of Canada the word "person" means a corporation. A corporation is a fictional entity, it exisits only on paper and in the minds of living men and women. No living human being can be a corporation.
Interpretation Act I-21 An Act respecting the interpretation of statutes and regulations
SHORT TITLE
Short title 1. This Act may be cited as the Interpretation Act.
"person" +personne + "person" , or any word or expression descriptive of a person, includes a corporation;
(27) "Person" means an individual, corporation, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, limited liability company, association, joint venture, government, governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality, public corporation, or any other legal or commercial entity. ---Fr UCC
Person - The Revised Code of Washington, RCW 1.16.080, (I live in Washington State) defines a person as follows: "The term 'person' may be construed to include the United States, this state, or any state or territory, or any public or private corporation, as well as an individual."
Person - Black's Law Dictionary 6th Edition, pg. 791, defines 'person' as follows: "In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person), though by statute term may include labor organizations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers."
Person - Oran's Dictionary of the Law, West Group 1999, defines Person as: 1. A human being (a "natural" person). 2. A corporation (an "artificial" person). Corporations are treated as persons in many legal situations. Also, the word "person" includes corporations in most definitions in this dictionary. 3. Any other "being" entitled to sue as a legal entity (a government, an association, a group of Trustees, etc.). 4. The plural of person is persons, not people (see that word). -
Person - Duhaime's Law Dictionary. An entity with legal rights and existence including the ability to sue and be sued, to sign contracts, to receive gifts, to appear in court either by themselves or by lawyer and, generally, other powers incidental to the full expression of the entity in law. Individuals are "persons" in law unless they are minors or under some kind of other incapacity such as a court finding of mental incapacity. Many laws give certain powers to "persons" which, in almost all instances, includes business organizations that have been formally registered such as partnerships, corporations or associations. -
Person, noun. per'sn. - Webster's 1828 Dictionary. Defines person as: [Latin persona; said to be compounded of per, through or by, and sonus, sound; a Latin word signifying primarily a mask used by actors on the stage.]
legal person - Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law 1996, defines a legal person as : a body of persons or an entity (as a corporation) considered as having many of the rights and responsibilities of a natural person and esp. the capacity to sue and be sued.
In Canada¦s Interpretation Act, section 35 (1) a (US codes have an equivalent) (person÷, or any word or expression descriptive of a person, includes a corporation; (includes÷ means: (confines within÷. Legal Maxim Blacks Law Dictionary Revised 4th Edition 1968 Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius - The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. I finally got around to looking up the word Canada. (Canada, for greater certainty, includes the internal waters of Canada and the territorial sea of Canada.÷ So, Canada is not land; it is water! It is also a corporation registered with the SEC in Washington, DC.
(4) "Bank" means a person engaged in the business of banking and includes a savings bank, savings and loan association, credit union, and trust company. -UCC
(25) "Organization" means a person other than an individual
Toronto lawyer David Sherman, an authority on tax law, has little patience for detaxer theories. "De-taxers say that because of such and such an analysis going back to the Magna Carta or something, the government can't impose taxes and therefore the income tax is voluntary. That's like telling someone that you can cure AIDS by boiling toads under a full moon and inhaling the steam while you stand on one foot reciting Hamlet's soliloquy backwards. The idea is any medical professional would recognize that as nonsense, though someone desperate enough might try it if [he doesn't] know what's going on. These de-taxers think they can know law without having any legal training. They read something that looks like it is written in English, but it's not, it's actually law and they think they understand it." http://www.camagazine.com/index.cfm/ci_id/6778/la_id/1/camagazine/1/print/true.htm
If you can't understand the words how can they be applied to you as if they have the force of law? Additionally, there are only two official languages English and French. This language called 'law' is not an official language is it? Of course lawyers make their money by ensuring the statutes are so convoluted and ambiguous that you need them to understand what is expressed within. This is exactly what Jesus railed against 2000 years ago; the Pharisees and Sadducee and Scribes who claimed exclusive right to understand the Law and then demanded rich payment to have the words deciphered.
If they aren't your words, they can't be your law and if you can't understand these words, they are not yours and thus should not be applied against you.
So, despite good intentions (Is the road to hell not paved with good intentions?) our peace officers are charging living human beings as corporations. Sadly, neither the peace officers, nor the "criminals" (or is victim more accurate?) are aware of this. The peace officer/policy enforcer at my front door did not, could not rebut me. I gave him some notes so he could research this important information himself.
I am requesting, and I do believe it is necessary, that the local police/peace officers/policy enforcers be informed, that I am a Freeman and not subject to statue laws since they apply to "person(s)" and that I have noticed you with Claim of Right. I will also go down to the local police station and see if I can speak to whom ever has the most authority and explain my Claim of Right. Under section 39 of the CCC;
39. (1) Every one who is in peaceable possession of personal property under a claim of right, and every one acting under his authority, is protected from criminal responsibility for defending that possession, even against a person entitled by law to possession of it, if he uses no more force than is necessary.
The following are some of the more important concepts for true Peace Officers to understand and grasp. If they cannot or will not comprehend then they simply cannot properly fulfill their duties.
1. Canada is a Common Law jurisdiction. 2. The only form of government recognized as lawful is a representative one. 3. Representation requires mutual consent. 4. Consent must be freely given and not a result of coercion or duress. 5. A statute is defined as a legislated rule of society given the force of law. 6. A society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal. 7. The Corporation of the City of Vancouver is in fact a corporation; a fictional legal entity. It is not a geographical area but it is a person. 8. A human being cannot exist within a fiction. (The truth dispels fiction) 9. The Rule of Law states conflict is avoidable, unnecessary and undesirable and when it raises its head we are to deal with it using discussion, negotiation and then if necessary adjudication in a court of competent jurisdiction. 10. The court of competent jurisdiction is a result of two parties attempting and failing to resolve a potential dispute using discussion and negotiation in Good Faith. 11. If a party refuses to discuss or negotiate, they abandon the right to seek adjudication in the issue at hand, as they abandoned the rule of law and it is impossible for a court of competent jurisdiction to be raised. 12. According to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, courts in this land have no authority to adjudicate unless both parties consent to the adjudication. 13. I have no obligation to consent to adjudication if the opposing party has abandoned the rule of law by refusing to avoid conflict by engaging in discussion. 14. According to a unanimous ruling from the SCC, since Canada is a common law jurisdiction and the only form of government recognized as lawful is a representational model, the power to govern is a direct result of the consent of the governed. They did not say µconsent of the majority of the governed¦ either. Individuals must consent individually, as no one may consent to representation on behalf of another. (I cannot hire someone to represent you without your consent and knowledge, nor can you hire a representative for me. Just because others consent to be represented does not mean I am obliged to as well.) 15. The right to elect our government necessarily implies the right to elect to have a government. If the only option we have is to choose who are masters will be, then we are nothing better than slaves who can choose their masters. Free men do not have masters. I am a free man and I do not have a master. 16. The statute against sedition necessarily implies that we have an option to escape government control which is peaceful. If we did not have an out, violence would be lawfully and morally justified to escape tyranny. The fact that we may not employ said violence indicates the existence of an out which does not require violence. 17. This out is our right to deny consent to be governed. 18. Neither corrections officers nor Sheriffs and their Deputies can lawfully claim authority over those who deny consent to be governed.
There are of course many more, however these key ones must be immediately taught in order for the Law and Justice to be served.
Now before I go any further here are the 20 questions I would like you to answer. If you cannot answer them within 10 business days of receiving this notice, I shall answer them for you and it shall stand as your consent and agreement that my answers are true. This seems fair to me.
1. What exactly is the number on the back (front) of my Birth Certificate? 2. Why is it not identified as to its function? 3. Is it a 'bond tracking' number? 4. If so, when was a bond generated? a) Who generated it? b) Did they enjoy informed consent? 5. What is the value of the bond, assuming there is one? 6. Who owns title to that bond? 7. Does that bond generate revenue? 8. Does my pledge, promise, oath or obligation, support the bond, if there is one? 9. If yes, when did I pledge, promise or make oath? 10. If there is no money in my bond generating revenue, who stole my money? 11. Who initially put money in the bond? 12. Is interest paid on that bond? 13. If so, to whom and how much interest is paid? 14. Does the revenue generated by the bond, if there is any, form part of the 'Federal Transfer Payments' the Federal and Provincial levels of government bicker over? 15. Would either level of representation have the right to control or access those payments if they were not acting as a representative? 16. To who do those Federal Transfer Payments actually belong? 17. Is there a fiduciary over the bond? 18. If so who is it? a) If not does this mean NO ONE is in charge of the bond? 19. Is it true we have the right to deny consent to be represented and thus governed? 20. Has your hand been 'in the cookie jar'?
Please answer these questions as herein directed. Many people want and need to know the answers to these simple questions. If you cannot or will not answer them, all must conclude that you are grossly incapable of representing me, and appropriate and lawful steps will then be taken.
There is a Greek law maxim (maxims are still valid today) that it is a fraud to conceal a fraud. I have been pursuing this line of research for over two years. Many members of the "government" (The corporation, CANADA) are unaware. There are however, many who are helping to perpetrate this. I have lost all my faith in public officials and peace officers. It has been both a rewarding and uplifting journey of freedom and a sad display of amount of corruption and ignorance that is present today. I cannot believe how hard it is to get what is mine under contract law/common law and help benefit my family and community. I reserve all my common law rights and reserve the right to edit any one of my Claim of Right as I see fit, at any time.
I thank you for your time and await your answers to my 20 questions. If you happen to bump into your next door neighbor at your office, I do believe he is a Notary, please tell him I'll be paying him a visit soon to discuss my Notice of Understanding and Intent Claim of Right and my Child of God status.
Non-Serviam "I will not serve." I will not serve that in which I no longer believe, whether it call itself my home, my fatherland or my church and I will try to express myself in some mode of life or art as freely as I can and as wholly as I can, using for my defense the only arms I allow myself to use--silence, exile and cunning. (Paradise Lost, John Milton, 1674; Portrait of an artist as a young man, James Joyce, 1914).
Sincerely and without malice aforethought, ill-will, vexation or frivolity, All Rights Reserved, With prejudice, UCC 1-207, UCC 1-308, Non-asumpsit ____________________________________________________ Thomas-Kerk: Jones, Agent Witness:____________________________________________ Witness:____________________________________________ Witness:____________________________________________
Constructive Notice of Denial of Consent
Whereas The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that the power of governments to govern comes from the consent of the governed, and, Whereas consent must be freely given and can never be forced, but can be gained expressly or tacitly, and, Whereas it my understanding that the government of the Province of Nova Scotia uses deception to gain the consent to govern, and, Whereas most people do not know we can deny our consent to be governed, and, Whereas I cannot, in good conscience, support any organization which uses unlawful means to generate agreements and manufacture apparent consent, and, Whereas the wording in many statutes is misleading to the point of deception.
Be it known, that I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones, as of [Day/Month/Year do hereby deny consent to be governed by any and all parties. No statutes can be deemed to apply to me for they are the product of a governing body; one that I do not consent to. I will not pay any taxes for the collection of taxes is a function of government and with my denial of consent. I free myself of any association with all governing bodies. I acknowledge I give up certain benefits. I affirm that all my Common Law Rights are still intact and I state my intent to exercise those rights. These rights include, but are not limited to, the right to private property and the right to travel on a public roadway without a license. Dated: ___________________ Claimant: Thomas-Kerk: Jones Signature: _____________________ Witness Signature (1): __________________________ Witness Signature (2): __________________________ Witness Signature (3): __________________________
Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right
Whereas it is my understanding Canada is a common law jurisdiction, and, Whereas it is my understanding equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and, Whereas it is my understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law, and, Whereas it is my understanding a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and, Whereas it is my understanding the only form of government recognized as lawful in Canada is a representative one, and, Whereas it is my understanding representation requires mutual consent, and, Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist, and, Whereas it is my understanding all Acts are statutes restricted in scope and applicability by the Constitution Act, and, Whereas it is my understanding Section 32 of the Constitution Act limits it to members and employees of government, and, Whereas it is my understanding those who have a SIN (Social Insurance Number) are in fact employees of the federal government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the federal government, and, Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to abandon one's SIN, and, Whereas it is my understanding people in Canada have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and, Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and, Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and, Whereas I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones am a Freeman-on-the-Land, and, Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully within community standards does not breach the peace, and, Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and, Whereas as I am a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility and not a child, I do not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability, and, Whereas it is my understanding a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and, Whereas it is my understanding corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and, Whereas it is my understanding legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones actions, and, Whereas it is my understanding that I have a right to use my property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and, Whereas I claim the right to collect a pension if I have paid into it and claim that said right is not affected if I abandon my Social Insurance Number, and, Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation to attend and create no obligation or dishonor if ignored, and,
Whereas it is my understanding peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law, and, Whereas I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have not observed me breach the peace, and, Whereas permanent estoppel by acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land under any Act is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time, Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones a Freeman-on-the-Land do hereby state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations restrictions and maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter .
Furthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my communities¦ standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for truth and maximum freedom. Furthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held by me is held under a claim of right as mentioned in the Criminal Code of Canada. Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or colour of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure. Furthermore, I claim that the courts in Nova Scotia are de-facto and are in fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further claim they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services. Furthermore, I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as herein stated as a Freeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any Act. Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated and TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent. Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way. Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms. Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both. Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit. Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within TEN (10) days of service of notice of this action. Reponses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered with a Notary no later than ten days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service.
Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land Thomas-Kerk: Jones.
Place of claim of right: The town of New Waterford, Cape Breton, Nova Scotia Claimant: Thomas-Kerk: Jones Signature: _____________________ Witness Signature (1): __________________________ Witness Signature (2): __________________________ Witness Signature (3): __________________________ Dated: __________________________________
Immediate, Constructive and Effective Notice of Claim of `Child of God' Status
Whereas Canada is a nation founded upon the belief in the principles of the supremacy of God and the rule of law, and, Whereas the above sentence defines a hierarchy, with God at the top, and, Whereas the number two position in that hierarchy is not claimed by anyone, and, Whereas the governments of this nation seem to rely on deception to gain the power to govern, and, Whereas I am desirous of living my life as a 'Child of God, and, Whereas the only powers able to claim any authority over a 'Child of God' is God, and, Whereas neither the government, nor it's agents nor it's representatives or employees are God, or above God, and, Whereas by legally claiming the number two position in the above mentioned hierarchy, I occupy a position above all governments and their agents and employees and representatives,
Be it known to any and all, that on this date, Thomas-Kerk: Jones, I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones, a free human being, do hereby lawfully claim the status of a 'Child of God'. Any human being who wishes to claim any authority over me must first prove they exist above God; they are God; they are between me and God; or they have a document upon the face of which can be found the verifiable signature of God. Failure to first do one of the above mentioned things means all claims to authority is abandoned or is unlawful. Attempting to exercise any authority over me without first fulfilling one of the four above mentioned requirements is an unlawful act of fraud and/or extortion. Signed: ______________________________ Date: ____________________ Witness: ______________________________Date: ____________________ Witness: ______________________________Date: ____________________
Constructive Notice and Claim of Right to Possess, Grow, Trade, Sell, and Consume Marijuana
Whereas I am a Human Being with certain inalienable rights, and, Whereas I understand that the right to posses marijuana is finally being recognized by the governments of this Nation, and, Whereas I understand that it appears that the government's in question have not properly instructed their agents as to my right without limit, possess, grow and use marijuana, and, Whereas I desire to exercise my rights fully and completely in a lawful and peaceful manner, without confrontational interaction with Peace Officers or other government agents, and, Whereas I desire to establish a legal foundation to exercise my right to possess, grow, use, carry and otherwise enjoy marijuana, and, Whereas I understand that by serving it upon The Attorney General I am serving it upon all Peace Officers under his authority, and, Whereas I understand that by serving it upon any Peace Officer I am also serving it upon the Attorney General, and, Whereas I understand ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law, and, Whereas the word "confiscate" legally means "to remove without legal right", and, Whereas I understand that Peace Officers who "confiscate" my marijuana are trained to use deadly force and are in fact stealing and acting under the color of law, and, Whereas I understand such actions are unlawful and against both the Common Law and Commercial Law, and, Whereas I understand that those Officers who steal my property can be sued for gross negligence, theft, and other indictable offenses, and, Whereas I have no desire to enter into any legal conflict with good Peace Officers and do desire to enter into any legal conflict with good Peace Officers and do desire peace BE IT KNOWN TO ANY AND ALL THAT I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones A FREE HUMAN BEING, ON THIS DAY __________ DO HEREBY ESTABLISH BY LAWFUL CLAIM OF RIGHT THE LEGAL RIGHT TO POSSESS, GROW, USE, HOLD, CARRY AND OTHERWISE ENJOY MARIJUANA AND ALL ITS DERIVATIVES WITHOUT LIMIT. All concerned parties have ten (10) business days to respond to this Notice in like manner or with a Notary. Failure to do so within ten (10) business days means you forever forfeit the right to claim conflict in this issue with me. Signed:_________________________________ Thomas-Kerk: Jones Witness:________________________________ Witness:________________________________ Witness:________________________________
Notice
From: Thomas-Kerk: Jones, Freeman-On-The-Land Mail pick-up @ 3516 Duggan Avenue New Waterford, N.S., B1H 1P8 thomaskerkjonesagent@gmail.com
To: CBRM/All Peace Officers/Policy Enforcers In New Waterford
Civic Service Center New Waterford 3365 Plummer Ave. Phone : (902) 862-3512
DATE: _________________________
Hi! I am Thomas-Kerk: Jones and I recently wrote to you, asking twenty simple questions as well as filing a Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right, Denial of Consent to be Governed, Child of God Status, Claim of Right to Marijuana and Claim of Right to Enthogens.
I informed you that if you failed to respond and answer those questions, I would answer them for you, and you would be bound by those answers as if they had been your own. As you have had time to respond, and have not, and as I am sure you have seen these questions before, your reluctance to answer is strongly indicative of fraudulent activity. Here are the answers to the questions. Now, if you are ever asked them again, you can refer to this correspondence and your other constituents won't have to wait or otherwise feel they are being defrauded.
What exactly is the number on the back (front) of my Birth Certificate? Answer: Bond Tracking Number Why is it not identified as to its function? Answer: Government does not want us to realize the Bond's existence. Is it a 'bond tracking' number? Answer: YES! If so, when was a bond generated Answer: When our parents registered our birth. Who generated it? Answer: The government did, with the apparent consent of our parents. Did they enjoy informed consent? Answer: NO, they did not! What is the value of the bond, assuming there is one? Answer: At least One Million Dollars Who owns title to that bond? Answer: Whoever holds The Record of Live Birth (Government) Does that bond generate revenue? Answer: If it does not, someone is guilty of either theft, or gross negligence. Does my pledge, promise, oath or obligation, support the bond, if there is one? Answer: YES! If yes, when did I pledge, promise or make oath? Answer: Your parents initially made oath, you confirmed when you applied for your SIN. If there is no money in my bond generating revenue, who stole my money? Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation. Who initially put money in the bond? Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation. Is interest paid on that bond? Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation. If so, to whom and how much interest is paid? Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation. Does the revenue generated by the bond, if there is any, form part of the 'Federal Transfer Payments' the Federal and Provincial levels of government bicker over? Answer: YES! Would either level of representation have the right to control or access those payments if they were not acting as a representative? Answer: NO! To who do those Federal Transfer Payments actually belong? Answer: Whoever is being represented. Is there a fiduciary over the bond? Answer: YES, of course! If so who is it? Answer: The Minister of Finance If not does this mean NO ONE is in charge of the bond? Is it true we have the right to deny consent to be represented and thus governed? Answer: Absolutely! Has your hand been 'in the cookie jar'? Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation.
As all can tell from our agreed upon answers to these questions, there is clearly a need for an RCMP investigation on five or more separate issues. If you do not agree this is the case, please get back to me within 7 days. I will be including a copy of this letter to the Commissioner of the RCMP and informing them that both I and my Member of Parliament feel there is a need for an immediate investigation.
The following are some of the more important concepts for true Peace Officers to understand and grasp. If they cannot or will not comprehend then they simply cannot properly fulfill their duties.
1. Canada is a Common Law jurisdiction. 2. The only form of government recognized as lawful is a representative one. 3. Representation requires mutual consent. 4. Consent must be freely given and not a result of coercion or duress. 5. A statute¦ is defined as a legislated rule of society given the force of law. 6. A society¦ is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal. 7. The Corporation of the City of Vancouver is in fact a corporation; a fictional legal entity. It is not a geographical area but it is a person. 8. A human being cannot exist within a fiction. (The truth dispels fiction) 9. The Rule of Law states conflict is avoidable, unnecessary and undesirable and when it raises its head we are to deal with it using discussion, negotiation and then if necessary adjudication in a court of competent jurisdiction. 10. The court of competent jurisdiction is a result of two parties attempting and failing to resolve a potential dispute using discussion and negotiation in Good Faith. 11. If a party refuses to discuss or negotiate, they abandon the right to seek adjudication in the issue at hand, as they abandoned the rule of law and it is impossible for a court of competent jurisdiction to be raised. 12. According to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, courts in this land have no authority to adjudicate unless both parties consent to the adjudication. 13. I have no obligation to consent to adjudication if the opposing party has abandoned the rule of law by refusing to avoid conflict by engaging in discussion. 14. According to a unanimous ruling from the SCC, since Canada is a common law jurisdiction and the only form of government recognized as lawful is a representational model, the power to govern is a direct result of the consent of the governed. They did not say consent of the majority of the governed¦ either. Individuals must consent individually, as no one may consent to representation on behalf of another. (I cannot hire someone to represent you without your consent and knowledge, nor can you hire a representative for me. Just because others consent to be represented does not mean I am obliged to as well.) 15. The right to elect our government necessarily implies the right to elect to have a government. If the only option we have is to choose who are masters will be, then we are nothing better than slaves who can choose their masters. Free men do not have masters. I am a free man and I do not have a master. 16. The statute against sedition necessarily implies that we have an option to escape government control which is peaceful. If we did not have an out, violence would be lawfully and morally justified to escape tyranny. The fact that we may not employ said violence indicates the existence of an out which does not require violence. 17. This out is our right to deny consent to be governed. 18. Neither corrections officers nor Sheriffs and their Deputies can lawfully claim authority over those who deny consent to be governed.
There are of course many more, however these key ones must be immediately taught in order for the Law and Justice to be served.
I have served you and your corporation and it's parent with notice informing you my denial of consent to be governed and to live free of all statutory regulation. I intend to express and make use of my God-given rights. I am not a corporation, a fiction, property of the Federal Reserve or any of its subsidiaries or any other commercial entity. I have no Queen and am not the property of the Royal Family, the Bank of London or the Vatican. I claim ownership and Claim of Right against all my property, including but not excluded to my Birth Registration Bond/Trust as evidenced by the number on the back of birth certificate and the original Statement of Live Birth, all of those funds are for my benefit and to be used as I see fit. I am Noticing that the property at the locations 3516 and 3522 Duggan Avenue, in New Waterford are private property, our family's and held under Claim of Right. Please keep your agents from trespassing, they are not allowed onto the property unless I invite them, with the exception of the mail carrier.
I am abandoning my S.I.N. I am not a number I am a Freeman.
I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated and TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent. Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way. Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms. Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both. Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit. Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within TEN (10) days of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered with a Notary no later than ten days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service.
Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land Thomas-Kerk: Jones.______________________________________ Thomas-Kerk: Jones, Freeman-on-the-Land All Rights Reserved, exercised at will and fully defended by the Grace of God. All my property including my body held under a Claim of Right as per Section 39 of the Criminal Code of Canada. Lawful Excuse established as per Sections 126 and 127 of the Criminal Code of Canada. Witness:________________________________ _________________ Witness:________________________________ _________________ Witness:________________________________ _________________
Constructive Notice and Claim of Right to Possess, Grow, Trade, Sell, and Consume Entheogens and Psyilocibin "Magic" Mushrooms
Whereas I am a Human Being with certain inalienable rights, and, Whereas I understand that the right to posses entheogens and psyilocibin "magic" mushrooms is finally being recognized by the governments of this Nation, and, Whereas I understand that it appears that the government's in question have not properly instructed their agents as to my right without limit, possess, grow and use enthogens and psyilocibin "magic" mushrooms, and, Whereas I desire to exercise my rights fully and completely in a lawful and peaceful manner, without confrontational interaction with Peace Officers or other government agents, and, Whereas I desire to establish a legal foundation to exercise my right to possess, grow, use, carry and otherwise enjoy entheogens and psyilocibin "magic" mushrooms, and, Whereas I understand that by serving it upon The Attorney General I am serving it upon all Peace Officers under his authority, and, Whereas I understand that by serving it upon any Peace Officer I am also serving it upon the Attorney General, and, Whereas I understand ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law, and, Whereas the word "confiscate" legally means "to remove without legal right", and, Whereas I understand that Peace Officers who "confiscate" my entheogens and psyilocibin "magic" mushrooms are trained to use deadly force and are in fact stealing and acting under the color of law, and, Whereas I understand such actions are unlawful and against both the Common Law and Commercial Law, and, Whereas I understand that those Officers who steal my property can be sued for gross negligence, theft, and other indictable offenses, and, Whereas I have no desire to enter into any legal conflict with good Peace Officers and do desire to enter into any legal conflict with good Peace Officers and do desire peace BE IT KNOWN TO ANY AND ALL THAT I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones A FREE HUMAN BEING, ON THIS DAY __________ DO HEREBY ESTABLISH BY LAWFUL CLAIM OF RIGHT THE LEGAL RIGHT TO POSSESS, GROW, USE, HOLD, CARRY AND OTHERWISE ENJOY ENTHEOGENS AND PSYILOCIBIN "MAGIC" MUSHROOMS AND ALL THEIR DERIVATIVES WITHOUT LIMIT. All concerned parties have ten (10) business days to respond to this Notice in like manner or with a Notary. Failure to do so within ten (10) business days means you forever forfeit the right to claim conflict in this issue with me. Signed:_________________________________ Thomas-Kerk: Jones Witness:________________________________ Witness:________________________________ Witness:________________________________
1. [A] formal legal document whereby a right is created or confirmed, or a fact recorded; a formal writing of any kind as an agreement, deed, charter, or record drawn up and executed in technical form.
"Como es arriba es abajo"= "As is top is below."
“Really, the fundamental, ultimate mystery -- the only thing you need to know to understand the deepest metaphysical secrets -- is this: that for every outside there is an inside and for every inside there is an outside, and although they are different, they go together.”-- Alan Watts quote
Gospel of Thomas (No. 3a):
“The wise men understood that this natural world is only an image and a copy of paradise. The existence of this world is simply a guarantee that there exists a world that is perfect. God created the world so that, through its visible objects, men could understand his spiritual teachings and the marvels of his wisdom.” --- The Alchemist, Paulo Coelho 
"I've always liked reptiles. I used to see the universe as a mammoth snake, and I used to see all the people and objects, landscapes, as little pictures in the facets of their scales. I think peristaltic motion is the basic life movement. Swallowing,"
.JPG)
.bmp)
Shedding my shirt, my book, my coat, my life
Leaving them, empty husks and fallen leaves
Going in search of food and for a spring
Of sweet water.
I'll find a tree as wide as ten fat men
Clear water rolling over it's gray roots
Berries I'll find, and crabapples and nuts,
And call it home.
I'll tell the wind my name, an no one else.
True madness takes or leaves us in the wood
halfway through all our lives. My skin will be my face now.
I must be nuts. Sense left with shoes and house,
my guts are cramped. I'll stumble through the green
back to my roots, and leaves and thorns and buds,
and shiver.
I'll leave the way of words to walk the wood
I'll be the forest's man, and greet the sun,
And feel the silence blossom on my tongue
like language.
--Neil Gaiman, from Fragile Things
Notice: Of Denial of Consent to be governed,
Understanding and Intent and Claim to Right
and request for information.
From: Thomas Kerk Jones, Agent
3516 Duggan Avenue
New Waterford, N.S., B1H 1P8
thomaskerkjonesagent@gmail.com
To: Frank Corbett
NDP, Cape Breton Centre
3397 Plummer Avenue, New Waterford, NS
Postal Code: B1H 1Z1
Tele :(902)-862-9550 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting (902)-862-9550 end_of_the_skype_highlighting begin_of_the_skype_highlighting (902)-862-9550 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Fax: 902-862-9501
Email: frankmla@ns.sympatico.ca
Date : June 12th, 2009
Greetings Mr. Corbett,
Congratulations on your recent election. I'm sure both you and your family are quite pleased and proud of your accomplishments. The reason I am writing to you today is to inform and notice you of my denial of consent to be governed; as well as to give you Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim to Right, and my status as a Child of God, the Son of the transcendent Godhead, the one true absolute God. I have decided now to exist without representation, and thus government. Although I do not desire conflict, my revulsion of subjugation and rejection of deception is far stronger than my desire to avoid conflict. I will not be subjugated. This courtesy letter is preceding a Claim of Right. Also I have included 20 questions, I would really appreciate your answers to. If you could include your oath of office and a statement declaring that you are bound by that oath, I would feel only then, that you or any public official is by forthright with me. No public official or "authority" has ever denied, corrected or included their oath or state they are bound by sed oath.
I, Thomas-Kirk: Jones; also known as Thomas-Kerk: Jones, a flesh and blood man and blessed living Soul serving God alone. I am not a corporation nor a government created fiction. I am a free-born sovereign individual to this land. I was born and given the name Thomas Kirk Jones, although now I spell my middle name differently to distinguish myself from the ALLCAPS entity THOMAS KIRK JONES. I have wrote via registered letter to the corporation known as the GOVERNMENT OF CANADA/CANADA and have their responses, addressed to myself, Kerk, to evidence the fact that I am not and could not be THOMAS KIRK JONES.
Recently, a peace officer knocked on my front door. He was handing out a "safer communities" survey. The irony of this my be not be immediately apparent. I gave the officer, free of charge, a 20 minute lecture on Acts/Statute Law. Acts are collections of statutes. Statues apply to corporations. Under the Interpretation Act of Canada, which defines what words legally mean here in Canada. Under the Interpretation Act of Canada the word "person" means a corporation. A corporation is a fictional entity, it exists only on paper and in the minds of living men and women. No living human being can be a corporation.
Interpretation Act
I-21
An Act respecting the interpretation of statutes and regulations
SHORT TITLE
Short title
1. This Act may be cited as the Interpretation Act.
"person"
personne +
"person" , or any word or expression descriptive of a person, includes a corporation;
(27) "Person" means an individual, corporation, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, limited liability company, association, joint venture, government, governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality, public corporation, or any other legal or commercial entity.
---Fr UCC
Person - The Revised Code of Washington, RCW 1.16.080, (I live in Washington State) defines a person as follows: "The term 'person' may be construed to include the United States, this state, or any state or territory, or any public or private corporation, as well as an individual."
Person - Black's Law Dictionary 6th Edition, pg. 791, defines 'person' as follows: "In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person), though by statute term may include labor organizations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers."
Person - Oran's Dictionary of the Law, West Group 1999, defines Person as: 1. A human being (a "natural" person). 2. A corporation (an "artificial" person). Corporations are treated as persons in many legal situations. Also, the word "person" includes corporations in most definitions in this dictionary. 3. Any other "being" entitled to sue as a legal entity (a government, an association, a group of Trustees, etc.). 4. The plural of person is persons, not people (see that word). -
Person - Duhaime's Law Dictionary. An entity with legal rights and existence including the ability to sue and be sued, to sign contracts, to receive gifts, to appear in court either by themselves or by lawyer and, generally, other powers incidental to the full expression of the entity in law. Individuals are "persons" in law unless they are minors or under some kind of other incapacity such as a court finding of mental incapacity. Many laws give certain powers to "persons" which, in almost all instances, includes business organizations that have been formally registered such as partnerships, corporations or associations. -
Person, noun. per'sn. - Webster's 1828 Dictionary. Defines person as: [Latin persona; said to be compounded of per, through or by, and sonus, sound; a Latin word signifying primarily a mask used by actors on the stage.]
legal person - Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law 1996, defines a legal person as : a body of persons or an entity (as a corporation) considered as having many of the rights and responsibilities of a natural person and esp. the capacity to sue and be sued.
In Canada's Interpretation Act, section 35 (1) (US codes have an equivalent)
person, or any word or expression descriptive of a person, includes a corporation;
includes means: confines within. Legal Maxim Blacks Law Dictionary Revised 4th Edition 1968 Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius - The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. I finally got around to looking up the word Canada.
Canada, for greater certainty, includes the internal waters of Canada and the territorial sea of Canada. So, Canada is not land; it is water! It is also a corporation registered with the SEC in Washington, DC.
(4) "Bank" means a person engaged in the business of banking and includes a savings bank, savings and loan association, credit union, and trust company.
-UCC
(25) "Organization" means a person other than an individual.
(24) "Money" means a medium of exchange currently authorized or adopted by a domestic or foreign government. The term includes a monetary unit of account established by an intergovernmental organization or by agreement between two or more countries.
Toronto lawyer David Sherman, an authority on tax law, has little patience for detaxer theories. "Detaxers say that because of such and such an analysis going back to the Magna Carta or something, the government can't impose taxes and therefore the income tax is voluntary. That's like telling someone that you can cure AIDS by boiling toads under a full moon and inhaling the steam while you stand on one foot reciting Hamlet's soliloquy backwards. The idea is any medical professional would recognize that as nonsense, though someone desperate enough might try it if [he doesn't] know what's going on. These detaxers think they can know law without having any legal training. They read something that looks like it is written in English, but it's not, it's actually law and they think they understand it."
http://www.camagazine.com/index.cfm/ci_id/6778/la_id/1/camagazine/1/print/true.htm
If you can't understand the words how can they be applied to you as if they have the force of law? Additionally, there are only two official languages English and French. This language called 'law' is not an official language is it? Of course lawyers make their money by ensuring the statutes are so convoluted and ambiguous that you need them to understand what is expressed within. This is exactly what Jesus railed against 2000 years ago; the Pharisees and Sadducee and Scribes who claimed exclusive right to understand the Law and then demanded rich payment to have the words deciphered.
If they aren't your words, they can't be your law and if you can't understand these words, they are not yours and thus should not be applied against you.
So, despite good intentions (Is the road to hell not paved with good intentions?) our peace officers are charging living human beings as corporations. Sadly, neither the peace officers, nor the "criminals" (or is victim more accurate?) are aware of this. The peace officer/policy enforcer at my front door did not, could not rebut me. I gave him some notes so he could research this important information himself.
I am requesting, and I do believe it is necessary, that you inform the local police/peace officers/policy enforcers, that I am a Freeman and not subject to statue laws since they apply to "person(s)" and that I have noticed you with Claim of Right. I will also go down to the local police station and see if I can speak to whom ever has the most authority and explain my Claim of Right. Under section 39 of the CCC;
39. (1) Every one who is in peaceable possession of personal property under a claim of right, and every one acting under his authority, is protected from criminal responsibility for defending that possession, even against a person entitled by law to possession of it, if he uses no more force than is necessary.
The following are some of the more important concepts for true Peace Officers to understand and grasp. If they cannot or will not comprehend then they simply cannot properly fulfill their duties.
1. Canada is a Common Law jurisdiction.
2. The only form of government recognized as lawful is a representative one.
3. Representation requires mutual consent.
4. Consent must be freely given and not a result of coercion or duress.
5. A statute is defined as a legislated rule of society given the force of law.
6. A society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal.
7. The Corporation of the City of Vancouver is in fact a corporation; a fictional legal entity. It is not a geographical area but it is a person.
8. A human being cannot exist within a fiction. (The truth dispels fiction)
9. The Rule of Law states conflict is avoidable, unnecessary and undesirable and when it raises its head we are to deal with it using discussion, negotiation and then if necessary adjudication in a court of competent jurisdiction.
10. The court of competent jurisdiction is a result of two parties attempting and failing to resolve a potential dispute using discussion and negotiation in Good Faith.
11. If a party refuses to discuss or negotiate, they abandon the right to seek adjudication in the issue at hand, as they abandoned the rule of law and it is impossible for a court of competent jurisdiction to be raised.
12. According to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, courts in this land have no authority to adjudicate unless both parties consent to the adjudication.
13. I have no obligation to consent to adjudication if the opposing party has abandoned the rule of law by refusing to avoid conflict by engaging in discussion.
14. According to a unanimous ruling from the SCC, since Canada is a common law jurisdiction and the only form of government recognized as lawful is a representational model, the power to govern is a direct result of the consent of the governed. They did not say consent of the majority of the governed either. Individuals must consent individually, as no one may consent to representation on behalf of another. (I cannot hire someone to represent you without your consent and knowledge, nor can you hire a representative for me. Just because others consent to be represented does not mean I am obliged to as well.)
15. The right to elect our government necessarily implies the right to elect to have a government. If the only option we have is to choose who are masters will be, then we are nothing better than slaves who can choose their masters. Free men do not have masters. I am a free man and I do not have a master.
16. The statute against sedition necessarily implies that we have an option to escape government control which is peaceful. If we did not have an out, violence would be lawfully and morally justified to escape tyranny. The fact that we may not employ said violence indicates the existence of an out which does not require violence.
17. This out is our right to deny consent to be governed.
18. Neither corrections officers nor Sheriffs and their Deputies can lawfully claim authority over those who deny consent to be governed.
There are of course many more, however these key ones must be immediately taught in order for the Law and Justice to be served.
Now before I go any further here are the 20 questions I would like you to answer. If you cannot answer them within 10 business days if receiving this notice, I shall answer them for you and it shall stand as your consent and agreement that my answers are true. This seems fair to me.
1. What exactly is the number on the back (front) of my Birth Certificate?
2. Why is it not identified as to its function?
3. Is it a 'bond tracking' number?
4. If so, when was a bond generated?
a) Who generated it?
b) Did they enjoy informed consent?
5. What is the value of the bond, assuming there is one?
6. Who owns title to that bond?
7. Does that bond generate revenue?
8. Does my pledge, promise, oath or obligation, support the bond, if there is one?
9. If yes, when did I pledge, promise or make oath?
10. If there is no money in my bond generating revenue, who stole my money?
11. Who initially put money in the bond?
12. Is interest paid on that bond?
13. If so, to whom and how much interest is paid?
14. Does the revenue generated by the bond, if there is any, form part of the 'Federal Transfer Payments' the Federal and Provincial levels of government bicker over?
15. Would either level of representation have the right to control or access those payments if they were not acting as a representative?
16. To who do those Federal Transfer Payments actually belong?
17. Is there a fiduciary over the bond?
18. If so who is it?
a) If not does this mean NO ONE is in charge of the bond?
19. Is it true we have the right to deny consent to be represented and thus governed?
20. Has your hand been 'in the cookie jar'?
Please answer these questions as herein directed. Many people want and need to know the answers to these simple questions. If you cannot or will not answer them, all must conclude that you are grossly incapable of representing me, and appropriate and lawful steps will then be taken.
There is a Greek law maxim (maxims are still valid today) that it is a fraud to conceal a fraud. I have been pursuing this line of research for over two years. Many members of the "government" (The corporation, CANADA) are unaware. There are however, many who are helping to perpetrate this. I have lost all my faith in public officials and peace officers. It has been both a rewarding and uplifting journey of freedom and a sad display of amount of corruption and ignorance that is present today. I cannot believe how hard it is to get what is mine under contract law/common law and help benefit my family and community. I reserve all my common law rights and reserve the right to edit any one of my Claim of Right as I see fit, at any time.
I thank you for your time and await your answers to my 20 questions. If you happen to bump into your next door neighbor at your office, I do believe he is a Notary, please tell him I'll be paying him a visit soon to discuss my Notice of Understanding and Intent Claim of Right and my Child of God status.
Non-Serviam "I will not serve." I will not serve that in which I no longer believe, whether it call itself my home, my fatherland or my church and I will try to express myself in some mode of life or art as freely as I can and as wholly as I can, using for my defense the only arms I allow myself to use--silence, exile and cunning. (Paradise Lost, John Milton, 1674; Portrait of an artist as a young man, James Joyce, 1914).
Sincerely and without malice aforethought, ill-will, vexation or frivolity,
All Rights Reserved, With prejudice, UCC 1-207, UCC 1-308, Non-asumpsit
____________________________________________________
Thomas-Kerk: Jones, Agent
Witness:____________________________________________
Witness:____________________________________________
Witness:____________________________________________
Constructive Notice of Denial of Consent
Whereas The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that the power of governments to govern comes from the consent of the governed, and,
Whereas consent must be freely given and can never be forced, but can be gained expressly or tacitly, and,
Whereas it my understanding that the government of the Province of Nova Scotia uses deception to gain the consent to govern, and,
Whereas most people do not know we can deny our consent to be governed, and,
Whereas I cannot, in good conscience, support any organization which uses unlawful means to generate agreements and manufacture apparent consent, and,
Whereas the wording in many statutes is misleading to the point of deception.
Be it known, that I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones, as of [Day/Month/Year do hereby deny consent to be governed by any and all parties. No statutes can be
deemed to apply to me for they are the product of a governing body; one that I do not consent to. I will not pay any taxes for the collection of
taxes is a function of government and with my denial of consent. I free myself of any association with all governing bodies. I acknowledge I give up
certain benefits. I affirm that all my Common Law Rights are still intact and I state my intent to exercise those rights. These rights include, but
are not limited to, the right to private property and the right to travel on a public roadway without a license.
Dated: ___________________
Claimant: Thomas-Kerk: Jones
Signature: _____________________
Witness Signature (1): __________________________
Witness Signature (2): __________________________
Witness Signature (3): __________________________
Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right
Whereas it is my understanding Canada is a common law jurisdiction, and,
Whereas it is my understanding equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and,
Whereas it is my understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law, and,
Whereas it is my understanding a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and,
Whereas it is my understanding the only form of government recognized as lawful in Canada is a representative one, and,
Whereas it is my understanding representation requires mutual consent, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist, and,
Whereas it is my understanding all Acts are statutes restricted in scope and applicability by the Constitution Act, and,
Whereas it is my understanding Section 32 of the Constitution Act limits it to members and employees of government, and,
Whereas it is my understanding those who have a SIN (Social Insurance Number) are in fact employees of the federal government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the federal government, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to abandon one's SIN, and,
Whereas it is my understanding people in Canada have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and,
Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and,
Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and,
Whereas I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones am a Freeman-on-the-Land, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully within community standards does not breach
the peace, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and,
Whereas as I am a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility and not a child, I do not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability, and,
Whereas it is my understanding a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and,
Whereas it is my understanding corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and,
Whereas it is my understanding legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones actions, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that I have a right to use my property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and,
Whereas I claim the right to collect a pension if I have paid into it and claim that said right is not affected if I abandon my Social Insurance Number, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation to attend and create no obligation or dishonor if ignored, and,
Whereas it is my understanding peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law, and,
Whereas I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have not observed me breach the peace, and,
Whereas permanent estoppel by acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land under any Act is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time,
Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones a Freeman-on-the-Land do hereby state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations restrictions and maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter .
Furthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my communitiesÆ standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for truth and maximum freedom.
Furthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held by me is held under a claim of right as mentioned in the Criminal Code of Canada.
Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or color of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure.
Furthermore, I claim that the courts in Nova Scotia are de-facto and are in fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further claim they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services.
Furthermore, I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as herein stated as a Freeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any Act.
Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated and TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent.
Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way.
Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.
Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both.
Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit.
Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within TEN (10) days of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered with a Notary no later than ten days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service.
Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land Thomas-Kerk: Jones.
Place of claim of right: The town of New Waterford, Cape Breton, Nova Scotia
Claimant: Thomas-Kerk: Jones
Signature: _____________________
Immediate, Constructive and Effective
Notice of Claim of `Child of God' Status
Whereas Canada is a nation founded upon the belief in the principles of the supremacy of God and the rule of law, and,
Whereas the above sentence defines a hierarchy, with God at the top, and,
Whereas the number two position in that hierarchy is not claimed by anyone, and,
Whereas the governments of this nation seem to rely on deception to gain the power to govern, and,
Whereas I am desirous of living my life as a 'Child of God, and,
Whereas the only powers able to claim any authority over a 'Child of God' is God, and,
Whereas neither the government, nor it's agents nor it's representatives or employees are God, or above God, and,
Whereas by legally claiming the number two position in the above mentioned hierarchy, I occupy a position above all governments and their agents and employees and representatives,
Be it known to any and all, that on this date, Thomas-Kerk: Jones,
I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones, a free human being, do hereby lawfully claim the status of a 'Child of God'.
Any human being who wishes to claim any authority over me must first prove they exist above God; they are God; they are between me and God; or they have a document upon the face of which can be found the verifiable signature of God.
Failure to first do one of the above mentioned things means all claims to authority is abandoned or is unlawful.
Attempting to exercise any authority over me without first fulfilling one of the four above mentioned requirements is an unlawful act of fraud and/or extortion.
Signed: ______________________________ Date: ____________________
Witness: ______________________________Date: ____________________
Witness: ______________________________Date: ____________________
Constructive Notice and Claim of Right to
Possess, Grow, Trade, Sell, and Consume Marijuana
Whereas I am a Human Being with certain inalienable rights, and,
Whereas I understand that the right to posses marijuana is finally being recognized by the governments of this Nation, and,
Whereas I understand that it appears that the government's in question have not properly instructed their agents as to my right without limit, possess, grow and use marijuana, and,
Whereas I desire to exercise my rights fully and completely in a lawful adn peaceful manner, without confrontational interaction with Peace Officers or other government agents, and,
Whereas I desire to establish a legal foundation to exercise my right to possess, grow, use, carry and otherwise enjoy marijuana, and,
Whereas I understand that by serving it upon The Attorney General I am serving it upon all Peace Officers under his authority, and,
Whereas I understand that by serving it upon any Peace Officer I am also serving it upon the Attorney General, and,
Whereas I understand ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law, and,
Whereas the word "confiscate" legally means "to remove without legal right", and,
Whereas I understand that Peace Officers who "confiscate" my marijuana are trained to use deadly force and are in fact stealing and acting under the color of law, and,
Whereas I understand such actions are unlawful and against both the Common Law and Commercial Law, and,
Whereas I understand that those Officers who steal my property can be sued for gross negligence, theft, and other indictable offenses, and,
Whereas I have no desire to enter into any legal conflict with good Peace Officers and do desire to enter into any legal conflict with good Peace Officers and do desire peace BE IT KNOWN TO ANY AND ALL THAT I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones A FREE HUMAN BEING, ON THIS DAY __________ DO HEREBY ESTABLISH BY LAWFUL CLAIM OF RIGHT THE LEGAL RIGHT TO POSSESS, GROW, USE, HOLD, CARRY AND OTHERWISE ENJOY MARIJUANA AND ALL ITS DERIVATIVES WITHOUT LIMIT.
All concerned parties have ten (10) business days to respond to this Notice in like manner or with a Notary. Failure to do so within ten (10) business days means you forever forfeit the right to claim conflict in this issue with me.
Signed:_________________________________
Thomas-Kerk: Jones
Witness:________________________________
Witness:________________________________
Witness:________________________________
Constructive Notice and Claim of Right to
Possess, Grow, Trade, Sell, and Consume Entheogens and Psyilocibin "Magic" Mushrooms
Whereas I am a Human Being with certain inalienable rights, and,
Whereas I understand that the right to posses entheogens and psyilocibin "magic" mushrooms is finally being recognized by the governments of this Nation, and,
Whereas I understand that it appears that the government's in question have not properly instructed their agents as to my right without limit, possess, grow and use enthogens and psyilocibin "magic" mushrooms, and,
Whereas I desire to exercise my rights fully and completely in a lawful adn peaceful manner, without confrontational interaction with Peace Officers or other government agents, and,
Whereas I desire to establish a legal foundation to exercise my right to possess, grow, use, carry and otherwise enjoy entheogens and psyilocibin "magic" mushrooms, and,
Whereas I understand that by serving it upon The Attorney General I am serving it upon all Peace Officers under his authority, and,
Whereas I understand that by serving it upon any Peace Officer I am also serving it upon the Attorney General, and,
Whereas I understand ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law, and,
Whereas the word "confiscate" legally means "to remove without legal right", and,
Whereas I understand that Peace Officers who "confiscate" my entheogens and psyilocibin "magic" mushrooms are trained to use deadly force and are in fact stealing and acting under the color of law, and,
Whereas I understand such actions are unlawful and against both the Common Law and Commercial Law, and,
Whereas I understand that those Officers who steal my property can be sued for gross negligence, theft, and other indictable offenses, and,
Whereas I have no desire to enter into any legal conflict with good Peace Officers and do desire to enter into any legal conflict with good Peace Officers and do desire peace BE IT KNOWN TO ANY AND ALL THAT I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones A FREE HUMAN BEING, ON THIS DAY __________ DO HEREBY ESTABLISH BY LAWFUL CLAIM OF RIGHT THE LEGAL RIGHT TO POSSESS, GROW, USE, HOLD, CARRY AND OTHERWISE ENJOY ENTHEOGENS AND PSYILOCIBIN "MAGIC" MUSHROOMS AND ALL THEIR DERIVATIVES WITHOUT LIMIT.
All concerned parties have ten (10) business days to respond to this Notice in like manner or with a Notary. Failure to do so within ten (10) business days means you forever forfeit the right to claim conflict in this issue with me.
Signed:_________________________________
Thomas-Kerk: Jones
Notice
From: Thomas-Kerk: Jones, Freeman-On-The-Land
Mail pick-up @
3516 Duggan Avenue
New Waterford, N.S., B1H 1P8
thomaskerkjonesagent@gmail.com
To: Frank Corbett
NDP, Cape Breton Centre
3397 Plummer Avenue, New Waterford, NS
Postal Code: B1H 1Z1
Tele :(902)-862-9550
Fax: 902-862-9501
Email: frankmla@ns.sympatico.ca
DATE: _________________________
Hi! I am Thomas-Kerk: Jones and I recently wrote to you, asking twenty simple questions as well as filing a Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right, Denial of Consent to be Governed, Child of God Status, Claim of Right to Marijuana and Claim of Right to Enthogens.
I informed you that if you failed to respond and answer those questions, I would answer them for you, and you would be bound by those answers as if they had been your own. As you have had time to respond, and have not, and as I am sure you have seen these questions before, your reluctance to answer is strongly indicative of fraudulent activity. Here are the answers to the questions. Now, if you are ever asked them again, you can refer to this correspondence and your other constituents won’t have to wait or otherwise feel they are being defrauded.
What exactly is the number on the back (front) of my Birth Certificate?
Answer: Bond Tracking Number
Why is it not identified as to its function?
Answer: Government does not want us to realize the Bonds’ existence.
Is it a 'bond tracking' number?
Answer: YES!
If so, when was a bond generated
Answer: When our parents registered our birth.
Who generated it?
Answer: The government did, with the apparent consent of our parents.
Did they enjoy informed consent?
Answer: NO, they did not!
What is the value of the bond, assuming there is one?
Answer: At least One Million Dollars
Who owns title to that bond?
Answer: Whoever holds The Record of Live Birth (Government)
Does that bond generate revenue?
Answer: If it does not, someone is guilty of either theft, or gross negligence.
Does my pledge, promise, oath or obligation, support the bond, if there is one?
Answer: YES!
If yes, when did I pledge, promise or make oath?
Answer: Your parents initially made oath, you confirmed when you applied for your SIN.
If there is no money in my bond generating revenue, who stole my money?
Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation.
Who initially put money in the bond?
Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation.
Is interest paid on that bond?
Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation.
If so, to whom and how much interest is paid?
Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation.
Does the revenue generated by the bond, if there is any, form part of the 'Federal Transfer Payments' the Federal and Provincial levels of government bicker over?
Answer: YES!
Would either level of representation have the right to control or access those payments if they were not acting as a representative?
Answer: NO!
To who do those Federal Transfer Payments actually belong?
Answer: Whoever is being represented.
Is there a fiduciary over the bond?
Answer: YES, of course!
If so who is it?
Answer: The Minister of Finance
If not does this mean NO ONE is in charge of the bond?
Is it true we have the right to deny consent to be represented and thus governed?
Answer: Absolutely!
Has your hand been 'in the cookie jar'?
Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation.
As all can tell from our agreed upon answers to these questions, there is clearly a need for an RCMP investigation on five or more separate issues. If you do not agree this is the case, please get back to me within 7 days. I will be including a copy of this letter to the Commissioner of the RCMP and informing them that both I and my Member of Parliament feel there is a need for an immediate investigation.
I have served you and your corporation and it's parent with notice informing you my denial of consent to be governed and to live free of all statutory regulation. I intend to express and make use of my God-given rights. I am not a corporation, a fiction, property of the Federal Reserve or any of its subsidiaries or any other commercial entity. I have no Queen and am not the property of the Royal Family, the Bank of London or the Vatican. I claim ownership and Claim of Right against all my property, including but not excluded to my Birth Registration Bond/Trust as evidenced by the number on the back of birth certificate and the original Statement of Live Birth, all of those funds are for my benefit and to be used as I see fit. I am Noticing that the property at the locations 3516 and 3522 Duggan Avenue, in New Waterford, are private property, our family's and held under Claim of Right. Please keep your agents from trespassing, they are not allowed onto the property unless I invite them, with the exception of the mail carrier.
I am abandoning my S.I.N. I am not a number I am a Freeman.
I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated and TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent.
Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way.
Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.
Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both.
Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit.
Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within TEN (10) days of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered with a Notary no later than ten days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service.
Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land Thomas-Kerk: Jones.
______________________________________
Thomas-Kerk: Jones, Freeman-on-the-Land
All Rights Reserved, exercised at will and fully defended by the Grace of God.
All my property including my body held under a Claim of Right as per Section 39 of the Criminal Code of Canada.
Lawful Excuse established as per Sections 126 and 127 of the Criminal Code of Canada.
Witness:________________________________ _________________
Witness:________________________________ _________________
Witness:________________________________ _________________
Notice: Of Denial of Consent to be governed,
Understanding and Intent and Claim to Right
and request for information.
From: Thomas Kerk Jones, Agent
Mail picked up @ 3516 Duggan Avenue
New Waterford, N.S., B1H 1P8
thomaskerkjonesagent@gmail.com
To: All Peace Officers/Policy Enforcers In New Waterford
Civic Service Center
New Waterford
3365 Plummer Ave.
Phone : (902) 862-3512
The reason I am writing to you today is to inform and notice you of my denial of consent to be goverened; as well as to give you Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim to Right, and my status as a Child of God, the Son of the trancedent Godhead, the one true absolute God. I have decided to exist without representation, and thus government. Although I do not desire conflict, my revulsion of subjugation and rejection of deception is far stronger than my desire to avoid conflict. I will not be subjugated. This courtesy letter is preceding a Claim of Right. Also I have included 20 questions, I would really appreciate your answers to. If you could include your oath of office and a statement declaring that you are bound by that oath, I would feel only then, that you or any public official is by forthright with me. No public offical or "authority" has ever denied, corrected or included their oath or state they are bound by sed oath.
I, Thomas-Kirk: Jones; also known as Thomas-Kerk: Jones, a flesh and blood man and blessed living Soul serving God alone. I am not a corporation nor a government created fiction. I am a free-born sovereign individual to this land. I was born and given the name Thomas Kirk Jones, although now I spell my middle name differently to distinguish myself from the ALLCAPS entity THOMAS KIRK JONES. I have wrote via registered letter to the corporation known as the GOVERNMENT OF CANADA/CANADA and have their responses, addressed to myself, Kerk, to evidence the fact that I am not and could not be THOMAS KIRK JONES.
Recently, a peace officer knocked on my front door. He was handing out a "safer communities" survey. The irony of this my be not be immediatly appearent. I gave the officer, free of charge, a 20 minute lecture on Acts/Statute Law. Acts are collections of statutes. Statues apply to corporations. Under the Interpretation Act of Canada, which defines what words legally mean here in Canada. Under the Interpretation Act of Canada the word "person" means a corporation. A corporation is a fictional entity, it exisits only on paper and in the minds of living men and women. No living human being can be a corporation.
Interpretation Act
I-21
An Act respecting the interpretation of statutes and regulations
SHORT TITLE
Short title
1. This Act may be cited as the Interpretation Act.
"person"
+personne +
"person" , or any word or expression descriptive of a person, includes a corporation;
(27) "Person" means an individual, corporation, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, limited liability company, association, joint venture, government, governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality, public corporation, or any other legal or commercial entity.
---Fr UCC
Person - The Revised Code of Washington, RCW 1.16.080, (I live in Washington State) defines a person as follows: "The term 'person' may be construed to include the United States, this state, or any state or territory, or any public or private corporation, as well as an individual."
Person - Black's Law Dictionary 6th Edition, pg. 791, defines 'person' as follows: "In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person), though by statute term may include labor organizations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers."
Person - Oran's Dictionary of the Law, West Group 1999, defines Person as: 1. A human being (a "natural" person). 2. A corporation (an "artificial" person). Corporations are treated as persons in many legal situations. Also, the word "person" includes corporations in most definitions in this dictionary. 3. Any other "being" entitled to sue as a legal entity (a government, an association, a group of Trustees, etc.). 4. The plural of person is persons, not people (see that word). -
Person - Duhaime's Law Dictionary. An entity with legal rights and existence including the ability to sue and be sued, to sign contracts, to receive gifts, to appear in court either by themselves or by lawyer and, generally, other powers incidental to the full expression of the entity in law. Individuals are "persons" in law unless they are minors or under some kind of other incapacity such as a court finding of mental incapacity. Many laws give certain powers to "persons" which, in almost all instances, includes business organizations that have been formally registered such as partnerships, corporations or associations. -
Person, noun. per'sn. - Webster's 1828 Dictionary. Defines person as: [Latin persona; said to be compounded of per, through or by, and sonus, sound; a Latin word signifying primarily a mask used by actors on the stage.]
legal person - Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law 1996, defines a legal person as : a body of persons or an entity (as a corporation) considered as having many of the rights and responsibilities of a natural person and esp. the capacity to sue and be sued.
In Canada¦s Interpretation Act, section 35 (1) a (US codes have an equivalent)
(person÷, or any word or expression descriptive of a person, includes a corporation;
(includes÷ means: (confines within÷. Legal Maxim Blacks Law Dictionary Revised 4th Edition 1968 Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius - The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. I finally got around to looking up the word Canada.
(Canada, for greater certainty, includes the internal waters of Canada and the territorial sea of Canada.÷ So, Canada is not land; it is water! It is also a corporation registered with the SEC in Washington, DC.
(4) "Bank" means a person engaged in the business of banking and includes a savings bank, savings and loan association, credit union, and trust company.
-UCC
(25) "Organization" means a person other than an individual
Toronto lawyer David Sherman, an authority on tax law, has little patience for detaxer theories. "De-taxers say that because of such and such an analysis going back to the Magna Carta or something, the government can't impose taxes and therefore the income tax is voluntary. That's like telling someone that you can cure AIDS by boiling toads under a full moon and inhaling the steam while you stand on one foot reciting Hamlet's soliloquy backwards. The idea is any medical professional would recognize that as nonsense, though someone desperate enough might try it if [he doesn't] know what's going on. These de-taxers think they can know law without having any legal training. They read something that looks like it is written in English, but it's not, it's actually law and they think they understand it."
http://www.camagazine.com/index.cfm/ci_id/6778/la_id/1/camagazine/1/print/true.htm
If you can't understand the words how can they be applied to you as if they have the force of law? Additionally, there are only two official languages English and French. This language called 'law' is not an official language is it? Of course lawyers make their money by ensuring the statutes are so convoluted and ambiguous that you need them to understand what is expressed within. This is exactly what Jesus railed against 2000 years ago; the Pharisees and Sadducee and Scribes who claimed exclusive right to understand the Law and then demanded rich payment to have the words deciphered.
If they aren't your words, they can't be your law and if you can't understand these words, they are not yours and thus should not be applied against you.
So, despite good intentions (Is the road to hell not paved with good intentions?) our peace officers are charging living human beings as corporations. Sadly, neither the peace officers, nor the "criminals" (or is victim more accurate?) are aware of this. The peace officer/policy enforcer at my front door did not, could not rebut me. I gave him some notes so he could research this important information himself.
I am requesting, and I do believe it is necessary, that the local police/peace officers/policy enforcers be informed, that I am a Freeman and not subject to statue laws since they apply to "person(s)" and that I have noticed you with Claim of Right. I will also go down to the local police station and see if I can speak to whom ever has the most authority and explain my Claim of Right. Under section 39 of the CCC;
39. (1) Every one who is in peaceable possession of personal property under a claim of right, and every one acting under his authority, is protected from criminal responsibility for defending that possession, even against a person entitled by law to possession of it, if he uses no more force than is necessary.
The following are some of the more important concepts for true Peace Officers to understand and grasp. If they cannot or will not comprehend then they simply cannot properly fulfill their duties.
1. Canada is a Common Law jurisdiction.
2. The only form of government recognized as lawful is a representative one.
3. Representation requires mutual consent.
4. Consent must be freely given and not a result of coercion or duress.
5. A statute is defined as a legislated rule of society given the force of law.
6. A society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal.
7. The Corporation of the City of Vancouver is in fact a corporation; a fictional legal entity. It is not a geographical area but it is a person.
8. A human being cannot exist within a fiction. (The truth dispels fiction)
9. The Rule of Law states conflict is avoidable, unnecessary and undesirable and when it raises its head we are to deal with it using discussion, negotiation and then if necessary adjudication in a court of competent jurisdiction.
10. The court of competent jurisdiction is a result of two parties attempting and failing to resolve a potential dispute using discussion and negotiation in Good Faith.
11. If a party refuses to discuss or negotiate, they abandon the right to seek adjudication in the issue at hand, as they abandoned the rule of law and it is impossible for a court of competent jurisdiction to be raised.
12. According to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, courts in this land have no authority to adjudicate unless both parties consent to the adjudication.
13. I have no obligation to consent to adjudication if the opposing party has abandoned the rule of law by refusing to avoid conflict by engaging in discussion.
14. According to a unanimous ruling from the SCC, since Canada is a common law jurisdiction and the only form of government recognized as lawful is a representational model, the power to govern is a direct result of the consent of the governed. They did not say µconsent of the majority of the governed¦ either. Individuals must consent individually, as no one may consent to representation on behalf of another. (I cannot hire someone to represent you without your consent and knowledge, nor can you hire a representative for me. Just because others consent to be represented does not mean I am obliged to as well.)
15. The right to elect our government necessarily implies the right to elect to have a government. If the only option we have is to choose who are masters will be, then we are nothing better than slaves who can choose their masters. Free men do not have masters. I am a free man and I do not have a master.
16. The statute against sedition necessarily implies that we have an option to escape government control which is peaceful. If we did not have an out, violence would be lawfully and morally justified to escape tyranny. The fact that we may not employ said violence indicates the existence of an out which does not require violence.
17. This out is our right to deny consent to be governed.
18. Neither corrections officers nor Sheriffs and their Deputies can lawfully claim authority over those who deny consent to be governed.
There are of course many more, however these key ones must be immediately taught in order for the Law and Justice to be served.
Now before I go any further here are the 20 questions I would like you to answer. If you cannot answer them within 10 business days of receiving this notice, I shall answer them for you and it shall stand as your consent and agreement that my answers are true. This seems fair to me.
1. What exactly is the number on the back (front) of my Birth Certificate?
2. Why is it not identified as to its function?
3. Is it a 'bond tracking' number?
4. If so, when was a bond generated?
a) Who generated it?
b) Did they enjoy informed consent?
5. What is the value of the bond, assuming there is one?
6. Who owns title to that bond?
7. Does that bond generate revenue?
8. Does my pledge, promise, oath or obligation, support the bond, if there is one?
9. If yes, when did I pledge, promise or make oath?
10. If there is no money in my bond generating revenue, who stole my money?
11. Who initially put money in the bond?
12. Is interest paid on that bond?
13. If so, to whom and how much interest is paid?
14. Does the revenue generated by the bond, if there is any, form part of the 'Federal Transfer Payments' the Federal and Provincial levels of government bicker over?
15. Would either level of representation have the right to control or access those payments if they were not acting as a representative?
16. To who do those Federal Transfer Payments actually belong?
17. Is there a fiduciary over the bond?
18. If so who is it?
a) If not does this mean NO ONE is in charge of the bond?
19. Is it true we have the right to deny consent to be represented and thus governed?
20. Has your hand been 'in the cookie jar'?
Please answer these questions as herein directed. Many people want and need to know the answers to these simple questions. If you cannot or will not answer them, all must conclude that you are grossly incapable of representing me, and appropriate and lawful steps will then be taken.
There is a Greek law maxim (maxims are still valid today) that it is a fraud to conceal a fraud. I have been pursuing this line of research for over two years. Many members of the "government" (The corporation, CANADA) are unaware. There are however, many who are helping to perpetrate this. I have lost all my faith in public officials and peace officers. It has been both a rewarding and uplifting journey of freedom and a sad display of amount of corruption and ignorance that is present today. I cannot believe how hard it is to get what is mine under contract law/common law and help benefit my family and community. I reserve all my common law rights and reserve the right to edit any one of my Claim of Right as I see fit, at any time.
I thank you for your time and await your answers to my 20 questions. If you happen to bump into your next door neighbor at your office, I do believe he is a Notary, please tell him I'll be paying him a visit soon to discuss my Notice of Understanding and Intent Claim of Right and my Child of God status.
Non-Serviam "I will not serve." I will not serve that in which I no longer believe, whether it call itself my home, my fatherland or my church and I will try to express myself in some mode of life or art as freely as I can and as wholly as I can, using for my defense the only arms I allow myself to use--silence, exile and cunning. (Paradise Lost, John Milton, 1674; Portrait of an artist as a young man, James Joyce, 1914).
Sincerely and without malice aforethought, ill-will, vexation or frivolity,
All Rights Reserved, With prejudice, UCC 1-207, UCC 1-308, Non-asumpsit
____________________________________________________
Thomas-Kerk: Jones, Agent
Witness:____________________________________________
Witness:____________________________________________
Witness:____________________________________________
Constructive Notice of Denial of Consent
Whereas The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that the power of governments to govern comes from the consent of the governed, and,
Whereas consent must be freely given and can never be forced, but can be gained expressly or tacitly, and,
Whereas it my understanding that the government of the Province of Nova Scotia uses deception to gain the consent to govern, and,
Whereas most people do not know we can deny our consent to be governed, and,
Whereas I cannot, in good conscience, support any organization which uses unlawful means to generate agreements and manufacture apparent consent, and,
Whereas the wording in many statutes is misleading to the point of deception.
Be it known, that I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones, as of [Day/Month/Year do hereby deny consent to be governed by any and all parties. No statutes can be
deemed to apply to me for they are the product of a governing body; one that I do not consent to. I will not pay any taxes for the collection of
taxes is a function of government and with my denial of consent. I free myself of any association with all governing bodies. I acknowledge I give up
certain benefits. I affirm that all my Common Law Rights are still intact and I state my intent to exercise those rights. These rights include, but
are not limited to, the right to private property and the right to travel on a public roadway without a license.
Dated: ___________________
Claimant: Thomas-Kerk: Jones
Signature: _____________________
Witness Signature (1): __________________________
Witness Signature (2): __________________________
Witness Signature (3): __________________________
Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right
Whereas it is my understanding Canada is a common law jurisdiction, and,
Whereas it is my understanding equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and,
Whereas it is my understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law, and,
Whereas it is my understanding a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and,
Whereas it is my understanding the only form of government recognized as lawful in Canada is a representative one, and,
Whereas it is my understanding representation requires mutual consent, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist, and,
Whereas it is my understanding all Acts are statutes restricted in scope and applicability by the Constitution Act, and,
Whereas it is my understanding Section 32 of the Constitution Act limits it to members and employees of government, and,
Whereas it is my understanding those who have a SIN (Social Insurance Number) are in fact employees of the federal government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the federal government, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to abandon one's SIN, and,
Whereas it is my understanding people in Canada have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and,
Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and,
Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and,
Whereas I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones am a Freeman-on-the-Land, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully within community standards does not breach
the peace, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and,
Whereas as I am a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility and not a child, I do not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability, and,
Whereas it is my understanding a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and,
Whereas it is my understanding corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and,
Whereas it is my understanding legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones actions, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that I have a right to use my property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and,
Whereas I claim the right to collect a pension if I have paid into it and claim that said right is not affected if I abandon my Social Insurance Number, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation to attend and create no obligation or dishonor if ignored, and,
Whereas it is my understanding peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law, and,
Whereas I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have not observed me breach the peace, and,
Whereas permanent estoppel by acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land under any Act is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time,
Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones a Freeman-on-the-Land do hereby state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations restrictions and maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter .
Furthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my communities¦ standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for truth and maximum freedom.
Furthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held by me is held under a claim of right as mentioned in the Criminal Code of Canada.
Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or colour of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure.
Furthermore, I claim that the courts in Nova Scotia are de-facto and are in fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further claim they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services.
Furthermore, I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as herein stated as a Freeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any Act.
Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated and TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent.
Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way.
Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.
Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both.
Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit.
Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within TEN (10) days of service of notice of this action. Reponses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered with a Notary no later than ten days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service.
Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land Thomas-Kerk: Jones.
Place of claim of right: The town of New Waterford, Cape Breton, Nova Scotia
Claimant: Thomas-Kerk: Jones
Signature: _____________________
Witness Signature (1): __________________________
Witness Signature (2): __________________________
Witness Signature (3): __________________________
Dated: __________________________________
Immediate, Constructive and Effective
Notice of Claim of `Child of God' Status
Whereas Canada is a nation founded upon the belief in the principles of the supremacy of God and the rule of law, and,
Whereas the above sentence defines a hierarchy, with God at the top, and,
Whereas the number two position in that hierarchy is not claimed by anyone, and,
Whereas the governments of this nation seem to rely on deception to gain the power to govern, and,
Whereas I am desirous of living my life as a 'Child of God, and,
Whereas the only powers able to claim any authority over a 'Child of God' is God, and,
Whereas neither the government, nor it's agents nor it's representatives or employees are God, or above God, and,
Whereas by legally claiming the number two position in the above mentioned hierarchy, I occupy a position above all governments and their agents and employees and representatives,
Be it known to any and all, that on this date, Thomas-Kerk: Jones,
I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones, a free human being, do hereby lawfully claim the status of a 'Child of God'.
Any human being who wishes to claim any authority over me must first prove they exist above God; they are God; they are between me and God; or they have a document upon the face of which can be found the verifiable signature of God.
Failure to first do one of the above mentioned things means all claims to authority is abandoned or is unlawful.
Attempting to exercise any authority over me without first fulfilling one of the four above mentioned requirements is an unlawful act of fraud and/or extortion.
Signed: ______________________________ Date: ____________________
Witness: ______________________________Date: ____________________
Witness: ______________________________Date: ____________________
Constructive Notice and Claim of Right to
Possess, Grow, Trade, Sell, and Consume Marijuana
Whereas I am a Human Being with certain inalienable rights, and,
Whereas I understand that the right to posses marijuana is finally being recognized by the governments of this Nation, and,
Whereas I understand that it appears that the government's in question have not properly instructed their agents as to my right without limit, possess, grow and use marijuana, and,
Whereas I desire to exercise my rights fully and completely in a lawful and peaceful manner, without confrontational interaction with Peace Officers or other government agents, and,
Whereas I desire to establish a legal foundation to exercise my right to possess, grow, use, carry and otherwise enjoy marijuana, and,
Whereas I understand that by serving it upon The Attorney General I am serving it upon all Peace Officers under his authority, and,
Whereas I understand that by serving it upon any Peace Officer I am also serving it upon the Attorney General, and,
Whereas I understand ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law, and,
Whereas the word "confiscate" legally means "to remove without legal right", and,
Whereas I understand that Peace Officers who "confiscate" my marijuana are trained to use deadly force and are in fact stealing and acting under the color of law, and,
Whereas I understand such actions are unlawful and against both the Common Law and Commercial Law, and,
Whereas I understand that those Officers who steal my property can be sued for gross negligence, theft, and other indictable offenses, and,
Whereas I have no desire to enter into any legal conflict with good Peace Officers and do desire to enter into any legal conflict with good Peace Officers and do desire peace BE IT KNOWN TO ANY AND ALL THAT I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones A FREE HUMAN BEING, ON THIS DAY __________ DO HEREBY ESTABLISH BY LAWFUL CLAIM OF RIGHT THE LEGAL RIGHT TO POSSESS, GROW, USE, HOLD, CARRY AND OTHERWISE ENJOY MARIJUANA AND ALL ITS DERIVATIVES WITHOUT LIMIT.
All concerned parties have ten (10) business days to respond to this Notice in like manner or with a Notary. Failure to do so within ten (10) business days means you forever forfeit the right to claim conflict in this issue with me.
Signed:_________________________________
Thomas-Kerk: Jones
Witness:________________________________
Witness:________________________________
Witness:________________________________
Notice
From: Thomas-Kerk: Jones, Freeman-On-The-Land
Mail pick-up @
3516 Duggan Avenue
New Waterford, N.S., B1H 1P8
thomaskerkjonesagent@gmail.com
To: CBRM/All Peace Officers/Policy Enforcers In New Waterford
Civic Service Center
New Waterford
3365 Plummer Ave.
Phone : (902) 862-3512
DATE: _________________________
Hi! I am Thomas-Kerk: Jones and I recently wrote to you, asking twenty simple questions as well as filing a Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right, Denial of Consent to be Governed, Child of God Status, Claim of Right to Marijuana and Claim of Right to Enthogens.
I informed you that if you failed to respond and answer those questions, I would answer them for you, and you would be bound by those answers as if they had been your own. As you have had time to respond, and have not, and as I am sure you have seen these questions before, your reluctance to answer is strongly indicative of fraudulent activity. Here are the answers to the questions. Now, if you are ever asked them again, you can refer to this correspondence and your other constituents won't have to wait or otherwise feel they are being defrauded.
What exactly is the number on the back (front) of my Birth Certificate?
Answer: Bond Tracking Number
Why is it not identified as to its function?
Answer: Government does not want us to realize the Bond's existence.
Is it a 'bond tracking' number?
Answer: YES!
If so, when was a bond generated
Answer: When our parents registered our birth.
Who generated it?
Answer: The government did, with the apparent consent of our parents.
Did they enjoy informed consent?
Answer: NO, they did not!
What is the value of the bond, assuming there is one?
Answer: At least One Million Dollars
Who owns title to that bond?
Answer: Whoever holds The Record of Live Birth (Government)
Does that bond generate revenue?
Answer: If it does not, someone is guilty of either theft, or gross negligence.
Does my pledge, promise, oath or obligation, support the bond, if there is one?
Answer: YES!
If yes, when did I pledge, promise or make oath?
Answer: Your parents initially made oath, you confirmed when you applied for your SIN.
If there is no money in my bond generating revenue, who stole my money?
Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation.
Who initially put money in the bond?
Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation.
Is interest paid on that bond?
Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation.
If so, to whom and how much interest is paid?
Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation.
Does the revenue generated by the bond, if there is any, form part of the 'Federal Transfer Payments' the Federal and Provincial levels of government bicker over?
Answer: YES!
Would either level of representation have the right to control or access those payments if they were not acting as a representative?
Answer: NO!
To who do those Federal Transfer Payments actually belong?
Answer: Whoever is being represented.
Is there a fiduciary over the bond?
Answer: YES, of course!
If so who is it?
Answer: The Minister of Finance
If not does this mean NO ONE is in charge of the bond?
Is it true we have the right to deny consent to be represented and thus governed?
Answer: Absolutely!
Has your hand been 'in the cookie jar'?
Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation.
As all can tell from our agreed upon answers to these questions, there is clearly a need for an RCMP investigation on five or more separate issues. If you do not agree this is the case, please get back to me within 7 days. I will be including a copy of this letter to the Commissioner of the RCMP and informing them that both I and my Member of Parliament feel there is a need for an immediate investigation.
The following are some of the more important concepts for true Peace Officers to understand and grasp. If they cannot or will not comprehend then they simply cannot properly fulfill their duties.
1. Canada is a Common Law jurisdiction.
2. The only form of government recognized as lawful is a representative one.
3. Representation requires mutual consent.
4. Consent must be freely given and not a result of coercion or duress.
5. A statute¦ is defined as a legislated rule of society given the force of law.
6. A society¦ is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal.
7. The Corporation of the City of Vancouver is in fact a corporation; a fictional legal entity. It is not a geographical area but it is a person.
8. A human being cannot exist within a fiction. (The truth dispels fiction)
9. The Rule of Law states conflict is avoidable, unnecessary and undesirable and when it raises its head we are to deal with it using discussion, negotiation and then if necessary adjudication in a court of competent jurisdiction.
10. The court of competent jurisdiction is a result of two parties attempting and failing to resolve a potential dispute using discussion and negotiation in Good Faith.
11. If a party refuses to discuss or negotiate, they abandon the right to seek adjudication in the issue at hand, as they abandoned the rule of law and it is impossible for a court of competent jurisdiction to be raised.
12. According to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, courts in this land have no authority to adjudicate unless both parties consent to the adjudication.
13. I have no obligation to consent to adjudication if the opposing party has abandoned the rule of law by refusing to avoid conflict by engaging in discussion.
14. According to a unanimous ruling from the SCC, since Canada is a common law jurisdiction and the only form of government recognized as lawful is a representational model, the power to govern is a direct result of the consent of the governed. They did not say consent of the majority of the governed¦ either. Individuals must consent individually, as no one may consent to representation on behalf of another. (I cannot hire someone to represent you without your consent and knowledge, nor can you hire a representative for me. Just because others consent to be represented does not mean I am obliged to as well.)
15. The right to elect our government necessarily implies the right to elect to have a government. If the only option we have is to choose who are masters will be, then we are nothing better than slaves who can choose their masters. Free men do not have masters. I am a free man and I do not have a master.
16. The statute against sedition necessarily implies that we have an option to escape government control which is peaceful. If we did not have an out, violence would be lawfully and morally justified to escape tyranny. The fact that we may not employ said violence indicates the existence of an out which does not require violence.
17. This out is our right to deny consent to be governed.
18. Neither corrections officers nor Sheriffs and their Deputies can lawfully claim authority over those who deny consent to be governed.
There are of course many more, however these key ones must be immediately taught in order for the Law and Justice to be served.
I have served you and your corporation and it's parent with notice informing you my denial of consent to be governed and to live free of all statutory regulation. I intend to express and make use of my God-given rights. I am not a corporation, a fiction, property of the Federal Reserve or any of its subsidiaries or any other commercial entity. I have no Queen and am not the property of the Royal Family, the Bank of London or the Vatican. I claim ownership and Claim of Right against all my property, including but not excluded to my Birth Registration Bond/Trust as evidenced by the number on the back of birth certificate and the original Statement of Live Birth, all of those funds are for my benefit and to be used as I see fit. I am Noticing that the property at the locations 3516 and 3522 Duggan Avenue, in New Waterford are private property, our family's and held under Claim of Right. Please keep your agents from trespassing, they are not allowed onto the property unless I invite them, with the exception of the mail carrier.
I am abandoning my S.I.N. I am not a number I am a Freeman.
I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated and TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent.
Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way.
Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.
Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both.
Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit.
Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within TEN (10) days of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered with a Notary no later than ten days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service.
Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land Thomas-Kerk: Jones.______________________________________
Thomas-Kerk: Jones, Freeman-on-the-Land
All Rights Reserved, exercised at will and fully defended by the Grace of God.
All my property including my body held under a Claim of Right as per Section 39 of the Criminal Code of Canada.
Lawful Excuse established as per Sections 126 and 127 of the Criminal Code of Canada.
Witness:________________________________ _________________
Witness:________________________________ _________________
Witness:________________________________ _________________
Constructive Notice and Claim of Right to
Possess, Grow, Trade, Sell, and Consume Entheogens and Psyilocibin "Magic" Mushrooms
Whereas I am a Human Being with certain inalienable rights, and,
Whereas I understand that the right to posses entheogens and psyilocibin "magic" mushrooms is finally being recognized by the governments of this Nation, and,
Whereas I understand that it appears that the government's in question have not properly instructed their agents as to my right without limit, possess, grow and use enthogens and psyilocibin "magic" mushrooms, and,
Whereas I desire to exercise my rights fully and completely in a lawful and peaceful manner, without confrontational interaction with Peace Officers or other government agents, and,
Whereas I desire to establish a legal foundation to exercise my right to possess, grow, use, carry and otherwise enjoy entheogens and psyilocibin "magic" mushrooms, and,
Whereas I understand that by serving it upon The Attorney General I am serving it upon all Peace Officers under his authority, and,
Whereas I understand that by serving it upon any Peace Officer I am also serving it upon the Attorney General, and,
Whereas I understand ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law, and,
Whereas the word "confiscate" legally means "to remove without legal right", and,
Whereas I understand that Peace Officers who "confiscate" my entheogens and psyilocibin "magic" mushrooms are trained to use deadly force and are in fact stealing and acting under the color of law, and,
Whereas I understand such actions are unlawful and against both the Common Law and Commercial Law, and,
Whereas I understand that those Officers who steal my property can be sued for gross negligence, theft, and other indictable offenses, and,
Whereas I have no desire to enter into any legal conflict with good Peace Officers and do desire to enter into any legal conflict with good Peace Officers and do desire peace BE IT KNOWN TO ANY AND ALL THAT I, Thomas-Kerk: Jones A FREE HUMAN BEING, ON THIS DAY __________ DO HEREBY ESTABLISH BY LAWFUL CLAIM OF RIGHT THE LEGAL RIGHT TO POSSESS, GROW, USE, HOLD, CARRY AND OTHERWISE ENJOY ENTHEOGENS AND PSYILOCIBIN "MAGIC" MUSHROOMS AND ALL THEIR DERIVATIVES WITHOUT LIMIT.
All concerned parties have ten (10) business days to respond to this Notice in like manner or with a Notary. Failure to do so within ten (10) business days means you forever forfeit the right to claim conflict in this issue with me.
Signed:_________________________________
Thomas-Kerk: Jones
Witness:________________________________
Witness:________________________________
Witness:________________________________