Monday, September 13, 2010

The Fluoride Deception...

Christopher Bryson the Fluoride Deception

Fluoride, or Hydrofluorosilic acid (H 2 SiF 6 ), is not naturally occurring but is a waste by-product derived from the industrial manufacture of aluminium, zinc, uranium, aerosols, insecticides, fertilizers, plastics, lubricants and pharmaceuticals.
It is also a Part II Poison under the UK Poisons Act 1972 ranking in toxicity above lead and just below arsenic.
Fluoride is one of the basic ingredients in both PROZAC (FLUoxetene Hydrochloride) and Sarin nerve gas (Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl FLUoride).
American toothpastes containing fluoride are by law obliged to state, '"WARNING: Keep out of reach of children under 6 years of age. If you accidentally swallow more than used for brushing, seek professional help or contact a poison control center immediately."

Hitler used fluoride in the water to induce docility reference: "The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben" written by Joseph Borkin
Other References:
1. He H, Chen ZS, Liu XM, The effects of fluoride on the human embryo, Chinese Journal of Control of Epidemic Diseases, 1989, 4, 136-137.
2. Cheng YX, IQ of children in areas of high fluorine content, Chinese Journal of Control of Endemic Diseases, Supplement 1991.

Charles Eliot Perkins, a U.S industrial chemist whom the U.S government sent to help reconstruct the I.G Farben chemical plants in Germany at the end of the war, wrote in a 1954 letter to the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research:

"The German chemists worked out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass control that was submitted to and ... See Moreadopted by the German general staff. This plan was to control the population of any given area through mass medication of drinking water supplies. In this scheme of mass control, 'sodium fluoride' occupied a prominent place. However, and I want to make this very definite and very positive, the real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children's teeth. The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty. Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time gradually reduce the individuals power to resist domination by slowly poisoning and narcotizing this area of the brain tissue, and make him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official of the great Farben chemical industries and was prominent in the Nazi movement at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years research into the chemistry, biochemistry, physiology, and pathology of fluoride. Any person who drinks artificially fluoridated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person, mentally or physically."

Much research on the effects of fluorides on human physiology was done by
the Mellon Institute, under contract with major corporations that produce
fluoride. Because of the policies of Mellon, which does not allow the
decades of research to be accessed by the public except with express
permission of those companies who contract with it, the data is not
available to the public. However, there are literally thousands of
scientific studies which list physiological effects of fluorides. There
are no credible scientific studies which demonstrate that fluorides are
safe to ingest. Studies which are paid for by parties who manufacture
fluorides, products containing fluorides or have a vested interest in
maintaining the status quo are invalid because of a conflict of interest.
You cannot trust the fox to guard the henhouse.

Animal Studies and Carryover to Human Expectation

Literally thousands of studies are available on the physiological effects
of fluorides on animals and humans. However, toxicity studies are chiefly
carried out on animals. One of the immediate questions that arises is the
relevance of animal studies to humans. A 1995 study, Neurotoxicity of
Sodium Fluoride on Rats [ 1 ] , indicates that "experience with other
developmental neurotoxicants prompts expectations that changes in
behavioral functions will be comparable across species, especially humans
and rats." [ 2 ] The reason that rats appear to be used, rather than mice,
is that rats have a higher resistance to toxins and will not manifest
symptoms as readily. Logic then tells us that if rats are affected, the
potential for human damage is at least as great.

Human Considerations With Fluorides

Fluorides have been added to public water supplies for more than 40 years.
Even looking at the issue on a superficial level, dental fluorosis has
been on the rise in the mass population since the 1960's [ 3 ], which is
an indicator that the total amount of fluoride intake, including water
fluoridation, is has been on a serious level for some time. Exposures to
dietary fluoride easily exceed 100 parts per million (ppm); toothpastes,
which are packaged in aluminum tubes [ 4 ] ,contain 1000 to 1500 ppm
fluoride [ 5 ] .

Mouth-rinses contain 230-900 ppm [ 6 ] . Store-bought juices can contain
2.8 ppm fluoride [ 7 ], a fact which even the American Dental Association
admits [ 8 ]. However, biological effects are apparent at even lower
levels [ 9 ] , and fluorides are accumulative in the brain [ 10 ], with
the effects on behavior related directly to plasma fluoride levels [ 11 ].

Thus, there are studies which directly contradict claims by proponents
that fluorides do not pass the blood-brain barrier [ 12 ] which only
reflect short-term situations. Fluorides are cumulative, and short-term
studies are specifically designed by proponents in a weak attempt to
circumvent biological data [ 13 ]. Research indicates that agencies like
the AMA and ADA were reasonably honest about the issue prior to 1945,
before corporate pressure apparently forced them to "get in line".
According to the AMA on September 18, 1943, "fluorides are general
protoplasmic poisons, with the capacity to modify the metabolism of cells
by inhibiting certain enzymes. Sources of fluorine intoxication include
drinking water containing 1ppm or more of fluorine" [ 14 ]. Amazing, isn't
it? Even the ADA was honest about the issue back then, on October 1, 1944,
when it said, "drinking water containing as little as 1.2 ppm fluoride
will cause developmental disturbances ... we cannot run the risk of
producing such serious systemic disturbances. In light of our present
knowledge of the chemistry of the subject, the potentialities for harm
outweigh those for good "[ 15 ]. So, since the properties of fluorides
haven't changed, and the nature of human physiology haven't changed, why
do they maintain today that it causes "no harm"? What's wrong with this
picture? Since everything in society flows from the top down, we can only
assume that governmental agency pressure is the reason. In fact, that is
precisely the case, but why in God's name would that want to do that?

Since acquisition of reports on the behavior effects of fluorides on the
brain from U.S. sources is quite difficult, most of the reports (but not
all) are from foreign research. Chinese investigations have found that
levels of fluoride in water from 3-1 ppm affect the nervous system
directly without first causing physical deformations from skeletal
fluorosis [ 16 ].

Experiments on Rats and Fluorides

In rats exposed to 100 ppm fluoride for six weeks, starting at the age of
three months, fluoride levels increased in the medulla oblongata in both
sexes, and in the hippocampus of females, the sex with significant
behavioral disturbances [ 17 ].It is a matter of fact that the hippocampus
is neurologically considered to be the "central processor" in the brain
which integrates inputs from the environment, memory, and motivational
stimuli to produce behavioral decisions and modify memory [ 18 ]. Humans
are exposed to plasma levels of fluoride as high as those found in rat
studies [ 19 ], and considering water and food products containing
fluoride are given to babies and young children, it involves interruption
of normal brain development [ 20 ] and subsequent interference in the way
a human being perceives and is able to react to the environment, including
social situations of tyranny and domination.

Furthermore, generic behavioral pattern disruption as found in rat studies
can be indicative of a potential for motor dysfunction, intelligence
deficits and learning disabilities in humans [ 21 ]. As far as
accumulation of fluorides in the brain is concerned, with rats it was
found, in one case, that six weeks of consuming 75 and 100 ppm fluoride
produced a higher plasma fluoride level than did 125 ppm [ 22 ]. So,
long-term accumulation of low doses has a significant effect. The medical
establishment knew this in 1944, because they specifically said that
levels above 1ppm were dangerous. Why, then, was the "optimum level" for
water fluoridation (never mind the higher levels in foods and juices) set
at 1ppm? Why would the World Health Organization have a target of
fluoridating water supplies planetwide by the year 2000? [ 23 ] Why does
the Clinton administration push so hard to have the United States
completely fluoridated by the year 2000? Why does Mexico add 250 mg of
potassium fluoride to the salt consumed by the population? [ 24 ] Why in
1996 is the U.S. sending proponents of fluoridation to Scotland and
England to help quell the justifiable concerns of the public, who are
being termed "civil rights activists"?

More Human Studies

The Chinese have been a great source of information on the effect of
fluorides on the intelligence of children. A study done in 1995 by Li of
907 children demonstrated that "the IQ of children living in areas of
fluorosis was lower than areas where there was no fluorosis"[ 25 ].

According to the Li study, "it appears that the influence of a fluoride
environment on the development of intelligence may occur early in
development, such as the stages of embryonic life or infancy, when the
differentiation and growth of the nervous system is most rapid." [ 26 ]

Furthermore, "active and comprehensive measures should be taken to reduce
the fluoride intake by the population." [ 27 ] If we are already getting
an overdose from the environment, why do we need it added to the water?
The practice, even in terms of simple logic, is no defensible in any
shape, way or manner. Lastly, the Li study concludes with, "this suggests
that developing brain tissues are sensitive to fluorides." [ 28 ]

Other Chinese studies support the work by Li [ 29 ]. Since fluoride levels
in the body are cumulative, and fluoride intake lowers intelligence, the
end result is a population with little ability to evolve, or for that
matter with little ability to recognize or challenge tyranny. Since many
countries have banned fluoridation [ 30 ], and those countries are the
same ones who have less tendency to dominate the population than the ones
who do fluoridate, the picture is becoming clear. Since studies which
claim that fluorides prevent cavities are contracted by parties with a
conflict of interest, and there is no credible scientific evidence to
suggest that it does [ 31 ], one can only conclude that there is another
purpose for fluorides to be added to the water and food. One of the many
reasons they can get away with this is because of the paradoxical effect
of the effect of toxins on biological systems. There is not a linear
dose-response relationship [ 32 ]. What this means is that a small amount
of fluoride concentration has a great effect. Orthodox media and science
tells the public that a linear effect is the only observable phenomena.
They're lying. Meanwhile, social behavior getting more bizarre, producing
crime ... and requiring a calculated totalitarian response. As the total
accumulation of fluorides is approaching a toxic level, we see all sorts
of physiological phenomena in progress. Even gastrointestinal problems and
acid-stomach is produced by fluoridated water [ 33 ].

Use of Fluorides By the Nazi's and Soviets

Get ready for a shock. Fluorides have already been used in the 20th
century for the purpose of deliberately making populations submissive and
less likely to question authority.

At the end of the World War II, the United States Government sent Charles
E. Perkins, a research worker in chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and
pathology, to take charge of the vast I.G. Farben chemical plants in
Germany [ 34 ]. While there, Perkins was told by German chemists of a
scheme which had been worked out by them during the war and adopted by the
German General Staff, which was to control the population in any given
area through mass medication of drinking water [ 35 ]. In this scheme,
sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place. Repeated doses of infinitesimal
amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual's power to resist
domination by slowly poisoning and narcotizing a certain area of the
brain, and will make him submissive to the will of those who wish to
govern him [ 36 ]. The social effect was that it made it more difficult
for a person to defend his freedom. Both the Germans and Soviets (1940)
added sodium fluoride to the drinking water of prisoners of war to make
them stupid and docile [ 37 ]. It is also a well known fact among breeders
of purebred bulls that the administration of fluorides makes the bull more
submissive and easier to handle [ 38 ].

According to Senator Ambruster in his magnificent tome Treason's Peace -
German Dyes and American Dupes (1947), one of the largest producers of
fluorides as a hazardous waste by-product was the Aluminum Company of
America (ALCOA), who had a 1931 agreement with I.G. Farben in Germany, as
did Dow Chemical Company (1933) to restrict American production of
materials vital to the U.S. war effort. Other companies such as Imperial
Chemical Industries (ICI, England), DuPont, Standard Oil (Rockefeller, who
contributed war materials and money to Hitler), American Cyanamid and
Sterling-Winthrop-Bayer were Farben associates. Indictments were filed
against several of these companies on January 30, 1941, covering
conspiracy, but inside forces spent so much effort at softening up the
Justice Department (which is still corrupt today) to prevent prosecution
that by April 15, 1942, all the defendants pleaded nolo contendre ("oh,
well, what if we did?") and paid fines of $25,000 each. It is also a fact
that I.G. Farben itself was indicted, but the case never came to court.
Some of Farben's leading subsidiaries in the U.S. were General Aniline and
Film (GAF), American I.G., and Bayer, but it was their associate ALCOA
which figured prominently in the introduction of fluoride wastes from
aluminum production (difficult of dispose of), quickly joined by LCI
(Florida) and other fertilizer industries who had fluoride by-products
classified by the EPA as hazardous waste [ 39 ].

According to scientist Charles Perkins, in a 1954 letter to the Lee
Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee, Wisconsin:

"We are told by the fanatical ideologists who are advocating the
fluoridation of the water supplies in this country that their purpose is
to reduce the incidence of tooth decay in children, and it is the
plausibility of this excuse, plus the gullibility of the public and the
cupidity of public officials that this is responsible for the present
spread of artificial water fluoridation in this country. However, and I
want to make this very definite and very positive: the real reason behind
water fluoridation is not to benefit children's teeth. If this were the
real reason, there are many ways in which it could be done that are much
easier, cheaper and far more effective. The real purpose behind water
fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination,
control and loss of liberty. When the Nazis decided to go into Poland, the
German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific
and military ideas, plans and personnel, and also the scheme of mass
control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists
because it fitted ideally into their plan to Communize the world. I say
this with all earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spend
nearly 20 years research into the chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and
pathology of fluorine -- any person who drinks artificially fluoridated
water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same
person, mentally or physically." [ 40 ]

"In the April 1995 issue of the international science journal, Neurotoxicology, a private Australian research group reported that the widespread use of aluminum salts to purify water may lead to brain damage and may account for the large scale loss of memory experienced by people suffering from Alzheimer's disease!
The Australia Institute of Biomedical Research, based in Sydney, reported that experiments with rats showed that tiny amounts of aluminum consumed in water found its way to their brains and accumulated there. It has been known for twenty years that if aluminum accumulated in the brain over a period of time, it could kill off neurons and cause memory loss. Institute researcher Judie Walton noted the worldwide massive increase in Alzheimer's disease over the past 70 years. She pointed out: 'We are drinking it and eating it throughout our lifetimes, so by the time we are quite old we have had a lot of exposure to aluminum.' Aluminum is also found in food emulsifiers, anti-perspirant deodorants, baking powder, some toothpastes, and many of the commonly used cooking utensils.
The research on rats found measurable amounts of aluminum in their brains after just one glass of aluminum treated water. Walton observed: 'We really should look seriously at revisiting this possibility that aluminum addition to foods and drinking water is a health hazard.' Due to the concerns about a link between aluminum and Alzheimer's disease, Sydney, Australia's largest city, is already gradually withdrawing aluminum treatment of water.
Using aluminum to purify water may be even more dangerous than the use of fluoride and chlorine in our water. It is believed that the problem is worsened by the action of fluoride in facilitating the absorption of aluminum."

"One intriguing and disturbing fact about fluoridation is that over 90% of the agent used in US fluoridation schemes is not pharmaceutical grade sodium fluoride, on which practically all toxicological testing has been performed, but industrial grade hexafluorosilicic acid obtained from the air pollution scrubbing systems of the superphosphate industry (e.g. Cargill Fertilizer). By law, this waste cannot be dumped into the sea but the EPA allows it to be diluted down with our public drinking water. The union representing scientists at the EPA headquarters in Washington, DC has gone on record as opposing this bizarre form of hazardous waste management (See"


- Fluoride is a waste by-product of the fertilizer and aluminum industry and it’s also a Part II Poison under the UK Poisons Act 1972.

- Fluoride is one of the basic ingredients in both PROZAC (FLUoxetene Hydrochloride) and Sarin nerve gas (Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl FLUoride).

- USAF Major George R. Jordan testified before Un-American Activity committees of Congress in the 1950’s that in his post as U.S.-Soviet liaison officer, the Soviets openly admitted to “Using the fluoride in the water supplies in their concentration camps, to make the prisoners stupid, docile, and subservient.”

- The first occurrence of fluoridated drinking water on Earth was found in Germany’s Nazi prison camps. The Gestapo had little concern about fluoride’s supposed effect on children’s teeth; their alleged reason for mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to sterilize humans and force the people in their concentration camps into calm submission. (Ref. book: “The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben” by Joseph Borkin.)

- 97% of western Europe has rejected fluoridated water due to the known health risks, however 10% of Britons drink it and the UK government is trying to fast track the fluoridation of the entire country’s water supply.

- In Germany, Belgium and Luxembourg fluoridation of water was rejected because it was classified as compulsive medication against the subject’s will and therefore violated fundamental human rights.

- In November of 2006, the American Dental Association (ADA) advised that parents should avoid giving babies fluoridated water.

- Sources of fluoride include: fluoride dental products, fluoride pesticides, fluoridated pharmaceuticals, processed foods made with fluoridated water, and tea.